5.1 sec in total
303 ms
2.6 sec
2.2 sec
Visit 23e2.com now to see the best up-to-date 23 E 2 content for Canada and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about 23e2.com
We're a leading digital marketing agency in Toronto, providing web design, SEO, PPC campaigns, Google Maps Marketing, Google virtual tours
Visit 23e2.comWe analyzed 23e2.com page load time and found that the first response time was 303 ms and then it took 4.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
23e2.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.4 s
7/100
10%
Value8.7 s
1/100
25%
Value18.7 s
0/100
10%
Value13,260 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.375
28/100
15%
Value20.4 s
2/100
10%
303 ms
292 ms
98 ms
195 ms
195 ms
Our browser made a total of 67 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 67% of them (45 requests) were addressed to the original 23e2.com, 24% (16 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain 23e2.com.
Page size can be reduced by 488.9 kB (50%)
975.5 kB
486.6 kB
In fact, the total size of 23e2.com main page is 975.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 633.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 107.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 107.7 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 236.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, 23 E 2 needs image optimization as it can save up to 236.0 kB or 37% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 68 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 145.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. 23e2.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 145.2 kB or 89% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 16 (34%)
47
31
The browser has sent 47 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of 23 E 2. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
23e2.com
303 ms
autoptimize_30a48485f05e47a353704d6c53ea6ed6.css
292 ms
js
98 ms
autoptimize_single_d4d62db63dd1543d18d9ddf99d591815.css
195 ms
autoptimize_single_51c1efde98d71e6eca85f07aa22460a3.css
195 ms
autoptimize_single_074833e36b623884a38fdff0d3ffc35a.css
197 ms
autoptimize_single_2d0502903f6ba9928b82a4bd19a8f154.css
213 ms
css
134 ms
jquery.min.js
215 ms
autoptimize_single_a50df54cdb5db07695acac7cb13bd214.css
226 ms
autoptimize_single_78165030c20ea2dc8367e15ff0da27ac.css
218 ms
autoptimize_single_dcafa19105b59d7cd7e72a13eafcb123.css
221 ms
api.js
120 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
237 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
241 ms
hooks.min.js
708 ms
i18n.min.js
709 ms
autoptimize_95ddf85d63866283e658e1fa0f96d0c4.js
1127 ms
analytics.js
419 ms
cropped-cropped-84161669_124285955524320_5205542062589476864_n-p026ng0u0y986d3zo9p7vu9337e8mi50zk20gwuusc.png
228 ms
BG-HomePage-High.png
224 ms
BG-home-new4.png
223 ms
93369935_210725833556833_6736703362516910080_n.png
226 ms
93398554_657932054770231_8665248449853128704_n.png
224 ms
Shapes-icons.png
412 ms
Untitled-1.png
412 ms
4.jpg
411 ms
1-1.jpg
413 ms
3.jpg
410 ms
Untitled-1-3.png
561 ms
2.jpg
559 ms
1.png
559 ms
2-2.png
558 ms
3.png
559 ms
4.png
744 ms
5.png
746 ms
NEW5.png
749 ms
new1.png
746 ms
74209782_2728881663822880_8523717294491172864_n.png
744 ms
NEW6.png
753 ms
73423416_539477966883013_7298435121479155712_n.png
748 ms
73136852_696086417541628_1304762939416248320_n.png
749 ms
new2.png
755 ms
upcity-1.png
767 ms
CTA-Shapes.png
754 ms
CTA-Home-page-New.png
895 ms
Partner-RGB.png
755 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
256 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
398 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf
396 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzc.ttf
408 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf
395 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf
383 ms
w8gdH283Tvk__Lua32TysjIfp8uK.ttf
434 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w5aX8.ttf
398 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX8.ttf
396 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr73w5aX8.ttf
399 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvC73w5aX8.ttf
398 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw5aX8.ttf
399 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf
400 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw5aX8.ttf
429 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr6Hw5aX8.ttf
400 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Xw5aX8.ttf
430 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
685 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
556 ms
linkid.js
196 ms
collect
164 ms
23e2.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[role]s are not contained by their required parent element
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
23e2.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
23e2.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
robots.txt is not valid
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise 23e2.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that 23e2.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
23e2.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of 23 E 2. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: