Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

activeparent.net

Software | United States | Central Access Corporation

Page Load Speed

3 sec in total

First Response

233 ms

Resources Loaded

2.6 sec

Page Rendered

234 ms

activeparent.net screenshot

About Website

Visit activeparent.net now to see the best up-to-date Activeparent content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about activeparent.net

K12 Education Software for Mississippi Schools

Visit activeparent.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Activeparent.net page load time and found that the first response time was 233 ms and then it took 2.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

activeparent.net performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

activeparent.net

233 ms

links.css

82 ms

fw_menu.js

170 ms

m_back.gif

45 ms

spacer_1px.gif

45 ms

Our browser made a total of 65 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 32% of them (21 requests) were addressed to the original Activeparent.net, 31% (20 requests) were made to Static.xx.fbcdn.net and 31% (20 requests) were made to Scontent.xx.fbcdn.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (864 ms) relates to the external source Scontent.xx.fbcdn.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 120.1 kB (20%)

Content Size

604.7 kB

After Optimization

484.6 kB

In fact, the total size of Activeparent.net main page is 604.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 543.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 30.6 kB

  • Original 35.0 kB
  • After minification 20.5 kB
  • After compression 4.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 14.5 kB, which is 41% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 30.6 kB or 87% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 68.1 kB

  • Original 543.1 kB
  • After minification 475.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Activeparent needs image optimization as it can save up to 68.1 kB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 21.4 kB

  • Original 26.4 kB
  • After minification 20.3 kB
  • After compression 5.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 21.4 kB or 81% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-50%

Potential reduce by 62 B

  • Original 125 B
  • After minification 79 B
  • After compression 63 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Activeparent.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 62 B or 50% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 16 (25%)

Requests Now

64

After Optimization

48

The browser has sent 64 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Activeparent. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

SEO Factors

activeparent.net SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Activeparent.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Activeparent.net main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Activeparent. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: