Report Summary

  • 27

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    47% of other websites

  • 52

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 21% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    19% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    71% of websites

aerostone.ru

??????????? ???? ????????????? ?????????? Bonolit (???????). ????????? ? ???????????? ????? ??????

Page Load Speed

13 sec in total

First Response

1.3 sec

Resources Loaded

11.4 sec

Page Rendered

308 ms

aerostone.ru screenshot

About Website

Welcome to aerostone.ru homepage info - get ready to check Aerostone best content for Russia right away, or after learning these important things about aerostone.ru

???? ???? ??????? - ???????????? ? ??????? ?????????? ? ???????????? ?????? Bonolit (???????) ? ?????? ? ???????.

Visit aerostone.ru

Key Findings

We analyzed Aerostone.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 1.3 sec and then it took 11.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

aerostone.ru performance score

27

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.8 s

5/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.5 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.2 s

13/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,030 ms

26/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.03

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.7 s

18/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

aerostone.ru

1267 ms

template_02f1ba2e819b3fe57eeacef13bb36f54.css

323 ms

template_befdfe5528b0b29cf98f66da13b45653.js

291 ms

SprySlidingPanels.js

290 ms

SprySlidingPanels.css

290 ms

Our browser made a total of 62 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 61% of them (38 requests) were addressed to the original Aerostone.ru, 23% (14 requests) were made to Clients.streamwood.ru and 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (7.8 sec) relates to the external source Clients.streamwood.ru.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 288.2 kB (31%)

Content Size

932.6 kB

After Optimization

644.4 kB

In fact, the total size of Aerostone.ru main page is 932.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 398.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 50.1 kB

  • Original 64.4 kB
  • After minification 53.8 kB
  • After compression 14.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 10.6 kB, which is 16% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 50.1 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 18.0 kB

  • Original 398.3 kB
  • After minification 380.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Aerostone images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-45%

Potential reduce by 175.5 kB

  • Original 388.8 kB
  • After minification 358.9 kB
  • After compression 213.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 175.5 kB or 45% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-55%

Potential reduce by 44.6 kB

  • Original 81.1 kB
  • After minification 72.2 kB
  • After compression 36.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Aerostone.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 44.6 kB or 55% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 28 (48%)

Requests Now

58

After Optimization

30

The browser has sent 58 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Aerostone. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

aerostone.ru accessibility score

52

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

aerostone.ru best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

aerostone.ru SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    WINDOWS-1251

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Aerostone.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Aerostone.ru main page’s claimed encoding is windows-1251. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Aerostone. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: