3.9 sec in total
493 ms
3 sec
390 ms
Click here to check amazing Ahnenblatt content for Germany. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about ahnenblatt.de
Ahnenblatt - Software zur Ahnenforschung unter Windows
Visit ahnenblatt.deWe analyzed Ahnenblatt.de page load time and found that the first response time was 493 ms and then it took 3.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
ahnenblatt.de performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.5 s
2/100
10%
Value10.7 s
0/100
25%
Value9.9 s
9/100
10%
Value240 ms
86/100
30%
Value0.004
100/100
15%
Value11.0 s
21/100
10%
493 ms
98 ms
191 ms
193 ms
193 ms
Our browser made a total of 87 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (75 requests) were addressed to the original Ahnenblatt.de, 2% (2 requests) were made to Cdn.jsdelivr.net and 2% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) belongs to the original domain Ahnenblatt.de.
Page size can be reduced by 512.3 kB (49%)
1.0 MB
535.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Ahnenblatt.de main page is 1.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 437.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 42.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 42.2 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 39.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ahnenblatt images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 279.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 279.5 kB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 150.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ahnenblatt.de needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 150.9 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 43 (55%)
78
35
The browser has sent 78 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ahnenblatt. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 21 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.ahnenblatt.de
493 ms
style.css
98 ms
style-responsive.css
191 ms
pt-sans.css
193 ms
nivo-slider.css
193 ms
default.css
193 ms
font-awesome.css
193 ms
font-awesome.less
285 ms
prettyPhoto.css
281 ms
blue.css
284 ms
fullpic.css
283 ms
climpek.css
281 ms
timeline.css
291 ms
jquery.mCustomScrollbar.css
382 ms
prettyPhoto.css
379 ms
wp-image-borders.css
379 ms
jquery-ui.min.css
8 ms
arconix-faq.css
382 ms
font-awesome.min.css
8 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.7.min.css
382 ms
jquery.js
477 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
473 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.js
474 ms
jquery.timeline.min.js
495 ms
jquery.mousewheel.min.js
475 ms
jquery.mCustomScrollbar.min.js
475 ms
rollover.js
571 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.js
574 ms
touch.js
569 ms
wp_cat_rss_style.css
571 ms
css
24 ms
tabs.js
572 ms
jquery.nivo.slider.js
587 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.js
667 ms
jquery.form.2.67.js
669 ms
common.js
664 ms
core.min.js
664 ms
widget.min.js
665 ms
mouse.min.js
673 ms
draggable.min.js
762 ms
wp-embed.min.js
688 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.7.min.js
595 ms
css
15 ms
jquery.easing.pack.js
590 ms
jquery.mousewheel.min.js
595 ms
sdk.js
28 ms
menu-icon.png
283 ms
climpek.png
488 ms
Ahnenblatt-Sticker-36-schattenlos1.png
578 ms
Ahnenblatt-Sticker-83-schattenlos1.png
669 ms
Ahnenblatt-Mainwindow-klein.jpg
672 ms
Ahnenblatt-Liste-klein.jpg
674 ms
Ahnenblatt-Tafel-klein.jpg
672 ms
blank.png
579 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
657 ms
111 ms
xd_arbiter.php
21 ms
xd_arbiter.php
48 ms
Ahnenblatt-Award-2015-small.png
682 ms
Geneaward2011Gold.png
775 ms
GeneAward-2011-hm-text.png
674 ms
Ahnenblatt2001.png
673 ms
social-twitter.png
670 ms
G0XvmuebhPCfCq4YdUpRgALUuEpTyoUstqEm5AMlJo4.ttf
8 ms
0XxGQsSc1g4rdRdjJKZrNMDdSZkkecOE1hvV7ZHvhyU.ttf
11 ms
social-facebook.png
584 ms
top-background.jpg
565 ms
fullpic.jpg
752 ms
glow.png
662 ms
button.png
569 ms
laptop.png
570 ms
ribbon-straight.png
659 ms
ribbon-center.png
663 ms
loader.gif
664 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
10 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
737 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
1040 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
827 ms
button-hover.png
498 ms
button-active.png
501 ms
newsletter-button.png
584 ms
newsletter-button-hover.png
593 ms
newsletter-button-active.png
595 ms
loading.gif
595 ms
Ahnenblatt-Willkommen-360x315.jpg
680 ms
bullets.png
682 ms
fontawesome-webfont.ttf
365 ms
ahnenblatt.de accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
ahnenblatt.de best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
ahnenblatt.de SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
DE
DE
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ahnenblatt.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ahnenblatt.de main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
ahnenblatt.de
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ahnenblatt. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: