3.2 sec in total
205 ms
2.7 sec
352 ms
Click here to check amazing Amandajanelife content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about amandajanelife.com
HOME
Visit amandajanelife.comWe analyzed Amandajanelife.com page load time and found that the first response time was 205 ms and then it took 3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
amandajanelife.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.2 s
19/100
10%
Value12.1 s
0/100
25%
Value15.0 s
1/100
10%
Value12,200 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.46
19/100
15%
Value21.7 s
1/100
10%
205 ms
585 ms
107 ms
314 ms
259 ms
Our browser made a total of 62 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 84% of them (52 requests) were addressed to the original Amandajanelife.com, 13% (8 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (964 ms) belongs to the original domain Amandajanelife.com.
Page size can be reduced by 160.6 kB (9%)
1.7 MB
1.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Amandajanelife.com main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 61.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 61.2 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Amandajanelife images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 53.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 53.8 kB or 21% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 41.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Amandajanelife.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 41.9 kB or 24% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 37 (74%)
50
13
The browser has sent 50 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Amandajanelife. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 18 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
amandajanelife.com
205 ms
amandajanelife.com
585 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
107 ms
style.min.css
314 ms
nectar-slider.css
259 ms
portfolio.css
348 ms
font-awesome-legacy.min.css
262 ms
grid-system.css
266 ms
style.css
436 ms
header-perma-transparent.css
344 ms
css
30 ms
responsive.css
354 ms
ascend.css
358 ms
menu-dynamic.css
419 ms
js_composer.min.css
430 ms
salient-dynamic-styles.css
522 ms
css
29 ms
jquery.min.js
519 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
450 ms
animate.min.css
516 ms
magnific.css
510 ms
core.css
578 ms
fullscreen-legacy.css
579 ms
anime.min.js
636 ms
nectar-slider.js
717 ms
imagesLoaded.min.js
638 ms
isotope.min.js
636 ms
salient-portfolio.js
637 ms
jquery.easing.min.js
637 ms
jquery.mousewheel.min.js
716 ms
priority.js
715 ms
nectar-slider-priority.js
715 ms
transit.min.js
715 ms
waypoints.js
777 ms
hoverintent.min.js
815 ms
magnific.js
815 ms
superfish.js
815 ms
init.js
964 ms
touchswipe.min.js
814 ms
comment-reply.min.js
868 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
787 ms
BLFRlogo100.png
412 ms
no-portfolio-item-tiny.jpg
329 ms
session1.jpg
814 ms
grid.png
436 ms
slide2.jpg
743 ms
relax.jpg
830 ms
beach-bikini.jpg
658 ms
villa.jpg
657 ms
balilifestyleandfitnessretreats-26.jpg
920 ms
slide4.jpg
743 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVc.ttf
79 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4uaVc.ttf
127 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4uaVc.ttf
141 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4uaVc.ttf
141 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf
142 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw5aX8.ttf
142 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw5aX8.ttf
141 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX8.ttf
139 ms
icomoon.woff
679 ms
fontawesome-webfont.svg
855 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
310 ms
amandajanelife.com accessibility score
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
amandajanelife.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
amandajanelife.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Amandajanelife.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Amandajanelife.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
amandajanelife.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Amandajanelife. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: