2.4 sec in total
494 ms
1.8 sec
150 ms
Click here to check amazing A Mark content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about amark.com
A leading portfolio of brands serving the precious metals community since 1965
Visit amark.comWe analyzed Amark.com page load time and found that the first response time was 494 ms and then it took 1.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
amark.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value9.3 s
0/100
10%
Value25.7 s
0/100
25%
Value14.8 s
1/100
10%
Value1,940 ms
8/100
30%
Value0.136
80/100
15%
Value24.2 s
0/100
10%
494 ms
23 ms
29 ms
196 ms
526 ms
Our browser made a total of 46 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 89% of them (41 requests) were addressed to the original Amark.com, 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (979 ms) belongs to the original domain Amark.com.
Page size can be reduced by 204.7 kB (22%)
932.1 kB
727.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Amark.com main page is 932.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 678.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 45.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 10.6 kB, which is 19% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 45.8 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 18.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. A Mark images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 106.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 106.8 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 33.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Amark.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 33.6 kB or 80% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (25%)
44
33
The browser has sent 44 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of A Mark. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests and as a result speed up the page load time.
amark.com
494 ms
css
23 ms
jquery.min.js
29 ms
combined.css
196 ms
combined.js
526 ms
urchin.js
19 ms
__utm.gif
22 ms
up-arrow.png
604 ms
header-bg.jpg
599 ms
lock.png
599 ms
logo.png
598 ms
nav-bg.jpg
599 ms
nav-space-bg.jpg
600 ms
search-back.png
602 ms
arrow-hover-up.png
601 ms
telephone.png
600 ms
chart-thumb.png
600 ms
prevarrow.png
602 ms
nextarrow.png
602 ms
close.png
603 ms
zoom.png
603 ms
10-thumb.png
604 ms
23-thumb.png
604 ms
17-thumb.png
607 ms
27-thumb.png
604 ms
22-thumb.png
605 ms
71-thumb.png
604 ms
73-thumb.png
605 ms
61-thumb.png
606 ms
74-thumb.png
607 ms
45-thumb.png
607 ms
75-thumb.png
607 ms
72-thumb.png
608 ms
pdficon_small.png
609 ms
lbma_badge.jpg
979 ms
tds_flyer.gif
611 ms
sunshine_mint.jpg
608 ms
Piedfort2.jpg
609 ms
bg_topnite.png
598 ms
bg_botnite.png
600 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
579 ms
bullion_bg2.png
69 ms
footer-bg.jpg
67 ms
ui-bg_glass_85_dfeffc_1x400.png
69 ms
ui-bg_inset-hard_100_f5f8f9_1x100.png
68 ms
down-arrow.png
67 ms
amark.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
amark.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
amark.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
robots.txt is not valid
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Amark.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Amark.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
amark.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of A Mark. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: