Report Summary

  • 27

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    47% of other websites

  • 73

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 39% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 97

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    91% of websites

ambition.co.uk

Professional services recruitment agency UK | Ambition · Ambition

Page Load Speed

10.5 sec in total

First Response

438 ms

Resources Loaded

6.8 sec

Page Rendered

3.2 sec

ambition.co.uk screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Ambition content for United Kingdom. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about ambition.co.uk

Ambition is a leading international recruitment agency specialising in professional services. We recruit for jobs in the areas of: Finance, Accounting, Marke...

Visit ambition.co.uk

Key Findings

We analyzed Ambition.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 438 ms and then it took 10 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

ambition.co.uk performance score

27

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.0 s

9/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value16.2 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.0 s

9/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value940 ms

30/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.03

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.3 s

12/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

ambition.co.uk

438 ms

ambition.co.uk

341 ms

www.ambition.co.uk

1346 ms

e5a57b2f-334f-4db8-b6b1-342c69fbe036.js

683 ms

hf.js

1042 ms

Our browser made a total of 50 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 54% of them (27 requests) were addressed to the original Ambition.co.uk, 6% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 6% (3 requests) were made to Script.hotjar.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.7 sec) relates to the external source In.hotjar.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 850.7 kB (25%)

Content Size

3.4 MB

After Optimization

2.6 MB

In fact, the total size of Ambition.co.uk main page is 3.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 843.7 kB

  • Original 978.8 kB
  • After minification 959.7 kB
  • After compression 135.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 843.7 kB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 6.9 kB

  • Original 2.4 MB
  • After minification 2.4 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ambition images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 66 B

  • Original 28.4 kB
  • After minification 28.4 kB
  • After compression 28.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (26%)

Requests Now

39

After Optimization

29

The browser has sent 39 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ambition. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

ambition.co.uk accessibility score

73

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

High

[role]s are not contained by their required parent element

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<dl>'s do not contain only properly-ordered <dt> and <dd> groups, <script>, <template> or <div> elements.

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

ambition.co.uk best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

ambition.co.uk SEO score

97

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    N/A

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ambition.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ambition.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Ambition. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: