2.3 sec in total
207 ms
1.9 sec
165 ms
Click here to check amazing Amp Maker content for United Kingdom. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about ampmaker.com
Visit ampmaker.comWe analyzed Ampmaker.com page load time and found that the first response time was 207 ms and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
ampmaker.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.9 s
25/100
10%
Value7.3 s
5/100
25%
Value6.6 s
37/100
10%
Value490 ms
59/100
30%
Value0.093
91/100
15%
Value7.6 s
46/100
10%
207 ms
498 ms
79 ms
158 ms
152 ms
Our browser made a total of 40 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 95% of them (38 requests) were addressed to the original Ampmaker.com, 3% (1 request) were made to Google.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (533 ms) belongs to the original domain Ampmaker.com.
Page size can be reduced by 455.2 kB (33%)
1.4 MB
920.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Ampmaker.com main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 854.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 25.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 5.3 kB, which is 17% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 25.5 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 47.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Amp Maker images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 254.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 254.9 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 126.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ampmaker.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 126.9 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 24 (63%)
38
14
The browser has sent 38 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Amp Maker. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
ampmaker.com
207 ms
home.php
498 ms
jquery.ui.theme.css
79 ms
main.css
158 ms
main.FF.css
152 ms
jquery.cluetip.css
152 ms
main.css
153 ms
main.css
153 ms
main.css
154 ms
main.css
225 ms
main.css
225 ms
main.css
226 ms
main.css
229 ms
altskin.css
226 ms
colorbox.css
229 ms
_bcb44c5edb5bf66ded060737a0800ae3.js
533 ms
jsapi
19 ms
jquery-fpss-comp.js
298 ms
func.js
298 ms
_07d187b2787e7cefcdb6c951bbe994bf.js
298 ms
kitsx.jpg
300 ms
cag01.jpg
448 ms
kits00.jpg
226 ms
parts01.jpg
373 ms
kits01.jpg
300 ms
clips01.jpg
375 ms
kits03.jpg
414 ms
spacer.gif
374 ms
checkmark.png
376 ms
jquery.min.js
28 ms
template_css.php
444 ms
loading_black.gif
78 ms
nav.gif
77 ms
go.gif
78 ms
controls.png
78 ms
border.png
78 ms
loading_background.png
78 ms
loading.gif
115 ms
wait.gif
117 ms
nav-active.gif
127 ms
ampmaker.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
ampmaker.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
ampmaker.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
ISO-8859-1
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ampmaker.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ampmaker.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
ampmaker.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Amp Maker. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: