4.3 sec in total
978 ms
3 sec
324 ms
Click here to check amazing AMS Filling content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about amsfilling.com
At AMS Filling, we turn your powder into profit with our quality filling machines. Our unmatched quality machines help improve your existing
Visit amsfilling.comWe analyzed Amsfilling.com page load time and found that the first response time was 978 ms and then it took 3.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
amsfilling.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.5 s
2/100
10%
Value7.5 s
4/100
25%
Value19.3 s
0/100
10%
Value58,250 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.001
100/100
15%
Value77.0 s
0/100
10%
978 ms
108 ms
99 ms
98 ms
164 ms
Our browser made a total of 87 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 78% of them (68 requests) were addressed to the original Amsfilling.com, 11% (10 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (978 ms) belongs to the original domain Amsfilling.com.
Page size can be reduced by 396.0 kB (31%)
1.3 MB
900.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Amsfilling.com main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 571.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 225.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 225.6 kB or 88% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 106.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, AMS Filling needs image optimization as it can save up to 106.7 kB or 19% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 53.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 53.2 kB or 24% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 10.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Amsfilling.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 62 (89%)
70
8
The browser has sent 70 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of AMS Filling. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 39 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 25 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.amsfilling.com
978 ms
gtm.js
108 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
99 ms
css
98 ms
dashicons.min.css
164 ms
extra.min.css
212 ms
style.min.css
218 ms
main.css
208 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
210 ms
frontend.min.css
220 ms
frontend.min.css
231 ms
font-awesome-all.css
262 ms
flaticon.css
259 ms
owl.css
260 ms
bootstrap.css
384 ms
jquery.fancybox.min.css
264 ms
animate.css
281 ms
nice-select.css
315 ms
color.css
316 ms
style.css
327 ms
responsive.css
318 ms
fionca-custom-theme.css
335 ms
css
99 ms
font-awesome.min.css
368 ms
mystickyelements-front.min.css
372 ms
css
104 ms
fontawesome.min.css
384 ms
solid.min.css
387 ms
jquery.min.js
397 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
423 ms
js
96 ms
elementor-custom.js
551 ms
popper.min.js
552 ms
bootstrap.min.js
552 ms
owl.js
553 ms
wow.js
555 ms
jquery.fancybox.js
559 ms
appear.js
555 ms
jquery.countTo.js
556 ms
scrollbar.js
556 ms
analytics.js
171 ms
nav-tool.js
555 ms
TweenMax.min.js
587 ms
tccl.min.js
31 ms
tti.min.js
55 ms
circle-progress.js
415 ms
jquery.nice-select.min.js
368 ms
isotope.js
368 ms
script.js
407 ms
fionca-custom.js
407 ms
jquery.cookie.js
393 ms
mystickyelements-fronted.min.js
368 ms
webpack-pro.runtime.min.js
382 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
382 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
542 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
541 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
519 ms
hooks.min.js
508 ms
i18n.min.js
505 ms
frontend.min.js
502 ms
waypoints.min.js
487 ms
core.min.js
487 ms
frontend.min.js
456 ms
elements-handlers.min.js
452 ms
js
128 ms
AMS_logo-half-reverse-360x1644-e1513348727844.png
376 ms
35th-Anniversary-Logo-300x294.jpg
494 ms
visit-us-at-tradeshow1-pnlw6xpoggcyi5o7a1z5abytpun7efzs21l6ei932g.png
727 ms
checkweighers-300x142.png
495 ms
check1126-removebg-preview.png
496 ms
P5sfzZCDf9_T_3cV7NCUECyoxNk37cxsBA.woff
48 ms
P5sfzZCDf9_T_3cV7NCUECyoxNk3CstsBA.woff
215 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc-.woff
217 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc-.woff
221 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc-.woff
219 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxM.woff
217 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc-.woff
218 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzQ.woff
216 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
355 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
351 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
475 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
352 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
353 ms
Flaticon.svg
474 ms
Flaticon.woff
427 ms
P5sdzZCDf9_T_10c3i9MeUcyat4iJY9jQxrH.woff
220 ms
P5sdzZCDf9_T_10c3i9MeUcyat4iJY-ERBrH.woff
219 ms
amsfilling.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA IDs are not unique
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
amsfilling.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
amsfilling.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Amsfilling.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Amsfilling.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
amsfilling.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of AMS Filling. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: