Report Summary

  • 19

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    36% of other websites

  • 77

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 45% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    56% of websites

animalpak.com

Workout Supplements For Those Who Are Built, Not Born | Animal Pak

Page Load Speed

1.5 sec in total

First Response

290 ms

Resources Loaded

667 ms

Page Rendered

546 ms

animalpak.com screenshot

About Website

Visit animalpak.com now to see the best up-to-date Animal Pak content for Mexico and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about animalpak.com

For four decades and counting, Animal has been the supplement choice for athletes all over the world. Bundle and Save up to 25%.

Visit animalpak.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Animalpak.com page load time and found that the first response time was 290 ms and then it took 1.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

animalpak.com performance score

19

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.5 s

14/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.5 s

9/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value50.6 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value86,480 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value116.0 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

animalpak.com

290 ms

style.css

6 ms

site.css

7 ms

table.css

261 ms

finddom.js

43 ms

Our browser made a total of 59 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Animalpak.com and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (290 ms) belongs to the original domain Animalpak.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 34.0 kB (39%)

Content Size

86.5 kB

After Optimization

52.5 kB

In fact, the total size of Animalpak.com main page is 86.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 47.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 30.8 kB

  • Original 35.4 kB
  • After minification 29.6 kB
  • After compression 4.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 5.8 kB, which is 16% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 30.8 kB or 87% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 187 B

  • Original 47.1 kB
  • After minification 46.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Animal Pak images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 1.1 kB

  • Original 1.4 kB
  • After minification 665 B
  • After compression 270 B

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.1 kB or 80% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 1.9 kB

  • Original 2.6 kB
  • After minification 2.0 kB
  • After compression 664 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Animalpak.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.9 kB or 74% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 28 (48%)

Requests Now

58

After Optimization

30

The browser has sent 58 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Animal Pak. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

animalpak.com accessibility score

77

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best Practices

animalpak.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

animalpak.com SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Animalpak.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Animalpak.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Animal Pak. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: