7 sec in total
33 ms
6.5 sec
441 ms
Click here to check amazing Annalsjournal content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about annalsjournal.com
Visit annalsjournal.comWe analyzed Annalsjournal.com page load time and found that the first response time was 33 ms and then it took 7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
annalsjournal.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value25.5 s
0/100
10%
Value30.7 s
0/100
25%
Value28.1 s
0/100
10%
Value8,360 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.177
68/100
15%
Value36.0 s
0/100
10%
33 ms
510 ms
114 ms
172 ms
447 ms
Our browser made a total of 96 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Annalsjournal.com, 33% (32 requests) were made to Lww.com and 29% (28 requests) were made to Journals.lww.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.1 sec) relates to the external source Cdn.cookielaw.org.
Page size can be reduced by 1.1 MB (41%)
2.6 MB
1.6 MB
In fact, the total size of Annalsjournal.com main page is 2.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 85% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 2.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 227.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 227.4 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Annalsjournal images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 790.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 790.2 kB or 40% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 52.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Annalsjournal.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 52.1 kB or 20% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 63 (84%)
75
12
The browser has sent 75 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Annalsjournal. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 51 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
annalsjournal.com
33 ms
default.aspx
510 ms
launch-31b54f0dec1c.min.js
114 ms
OtAutoBlock.js
172 ms
otSDKStub.js
447 ms
lww-cookiepro.js
486 ms
css
122 ms
corev15.css
168 ms
bootstrap.min.css
643 ms
font-awesome.min.css
125 ms
bootstrap-overwrites.css
641 ms
tachyons.css
651 ms
base-main-header.css
95 ms
lww-core.css
658 ms
ejp.css
669 ms
jqueryui.css
692 ms
journal.css
690 ms
custom.journal.css
688 ms
initstrings.js
654 ms
init.js
655 ms
strings.js
653 ms
theming.js
159 ms
ie55up.js
653 ms
ScriptResource.axd
1012 ms
blank.js
1011 ms
ScriptResource.axd
1167 ms
ScriptResource.axd
1233 ms
ScriptResource.axd
1296 ms
ScriptResource.axd
1355 ms
ScriptResource.axd
1353 ms
ScriptResource.axd
1487 ms
ScriptResource.axd
1551 ms
ScriptResource.axd
1485 ms
ScriptResource.axd
1548 ms
ScriptResource.axd
1549 ms
jquery.js
685 ms
bootstrap.bundle.min.js
1006 ms
jqueryui.js
1007 ms
lww-core.js
1344 ms
journal-navigation.min.js
1350 ms
journals_master.min.js
1350 ms
manifest.js
1342 ms
ejp.js
1346 ms
react-redux-vendors.js
1345 ms
client.js
136 ms
moatheader.js
113 ms
WebResource.axd
2053 ms
alerts-subscription.min.js
1542 ms
ImageWrapperControl.js
1542 ms
ArticleNavigator.js
2051 ms
ListContainerControlBase.js
2050 ms
fulltext.js
2052 ms
ArticleDisplayControl.js
2053 ms
ScriptResource.axd
2052 ms
js
2056 ms
WebResource.axd
2054 ms
UserToolbarDropdown.js
2053 ms
EmailToColleague.js
2052 ms
ExportToCitationManager.js
2052 ms
widgets.js
424 ms
gpt.js
123 ms
ads.js
2051 ms
ee.js
2051 ms
v84a3a4012de94ce1a686ba8c167c359c1696973893317
130 ms
7537629c-faa0-40ce-a837-f7b14c0d4e70.json
2141 ms
location
1325 ms
ejp-print.css
1050 ms
favicon.png
917 ms
spcommon.png
916 ms
XLargeThumb.01845215-202401000-00000.CV.jpeg
468 ms
IJS%20logo.png
304 ms
DisplayControlArticleImageSize.01845215-202401000-00013.T1.jpeg
469 ms
DisplayControlArticleImageSize.01845215-202401000-00046.F1.jpeg
680 ms
DisplayControlArticleImageSize.01845215-202401000-00067.F1.jpeg
469 ms
DisplayControlArticleImageSize.01845215-202401000-00101.F1.jpeg
679 ms
va9B4kDNxMZdWfMOD5VnLK3eRhf8.woff
459 ms
va9B4kDNxMZdWfMOD5VnSKzeRhf8.woff
669 ms
va9B4kDNxMZdWfMOD5VnZKveRhf8.woff
669 ms
va9E4kDNxMZdWfMOD5Vvl4jN.woff
672 ms
va9B4kDNxMZdWfMOD5VnPKreRhf8.woff
671 ms
CAPrivacyPolicy.png
377 ms
wk-brand-white.svg
152 ms
bg-header.png
155 ms
menu-down.gif
77 ms
wk-icons.woff
229 ms
DisplayControlArticleImageSize.01845215-202401000-00013.T1.jpeg
21 ms
print-toc-current.css
379 ms
DisplayControlArticleImageSize.01845215-202401000-00046.F1.jpeg
382 ms
DisplayControlArticleImageSize.01845215-202401000-00101.F1.jpeg
382 ms
va9f4kDNxMZdWfMOD5VvkrA6Qif4VF8.woff
101 ms
va9C4kDNxMZdWfMOD5VvkrjJYTQ.woff
100 ms
va9f4kDNxMZdWfMOD5VvkrBiQyf4VF8.woff
100 ms
va9f4kDNxMZdWfMOD5VvkrAWRSf4VF8.woff
100 ms
va9f4kDNxMZdWfMOD5VvkrByRCf4VF8.woff
101 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
47 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
111 ms
annalsjournal.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.
[aria-*] attributes do not have valid values
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
annalsjournal.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
annalsjournal.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Annalsjournal.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Annalsjournal.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
annalsjournal.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Annalsjournal. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: