Tools & Wizards About Us
aorticdissection.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 76

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    84% of other websites

  • 87

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 67% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 75

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    32% of websites

aorticdissection.com

Page Load Speed

11.7 sec in total

First Response

5 sec

Resources Loaded

6 sec

Page Rendered

644 ms

aorticdissection.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Aorticdissection content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about aorticdissection.com

My name is Brian S. Tinsley and I am an ascending aortic dissection survivor. Here’s my story! The purpose of this website is to provide other aortic dissection patients (ascending/descending/Both) wi...

Visit aorticdissection.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Aorticdissection.com page load time and found that the first response time was 5 sec and then it took 6.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

aorticdissection.com performance score

76

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.0 s

49/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.9 s

52/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.0 s

94/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value190 ms

91/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.115

86/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.8 s

89/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

aorticdissection.com

4984 ms

style.css

40 ms

layout.css

53 ms

custom.css

59 ms

twitter-feed.css

92 ms

Our browser made a total of 56 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 52% of them (29 requests) were addressed to the original Aorticdissection.com, 7% (4 requests) were made to Platform.twitter.com and 7% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (5 sec) belongs to the original domain Aorticdissection.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 696.5 kB (58%)

Content Size

1.2 MB

After Optimization

505.4 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Aorticdissection.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 568.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 60.4 kB

  • Original 82.3 kB
  • After minification 81.0 kB
  • After compression 21.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 60.4 kB or 73% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-12%

Potential reduce by 30.8 kB

  • Original 264.1 kB
  • After minification 233.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Aorticdissection needs image optimization as it can save up to 30.8 kB or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-65%

Potential reduce by 367.5 kB

  • Original 568.4 kB
  • After minification 568.1 kB
  • After compression 200.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 367.5 kB or 65% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 237.7 kB

  • Original 287.0 kB
  • After minification 275.4 kB
  • After compression 49.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Aorticdissection.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 237.7 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 28 (55%)

Requests Now

51

After Optimization

23

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 51 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Aorticdissection. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

aorticdissection.com

aorticdissection.com

4984 ms

style.css

style.css

40 ms

layout.css

layout.css

53 ms

custom.css

custom.css

59 ms

twitter-feed.css

twitter-feed.css

92 ms

avh-ec.widget.css

avh-ec.widget.css

346 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

93 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

67 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

59 ms

widgets.js

widgets.js

135 ms

count.js

count.js

288 ms

api.js

api.js

30 ms

anywhere.js

anywhere.js

66 ms

css

css

27 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

28 ms

UGVvAdblB7E

UGVvAdblB7E

415 ms

aorticdissection_1413399016_38.jpg

aorticdissection_1413399016_38.jpg

675 ms

32x32.png

32x32.png

547 ms

iframe

iframe

541 ms

PJbk6rfI_normal.jpeg

PJbk6rfI_normal.jpeg

402 ms

AD-logo-bw-e1452393355784.png

AD-logo-bw-e1452393355784.png

396 ms

icon-rss.gif

icon-rss.gif

396 ms

dot-ddd.gif

dot-ddd.gif

396 ms

brevig.jpg

brevig.jpg

395 ms

Tyler.jpg

Tyler.jpg

396 ms

aorticstuff-272x300.jpg

aorticstuff-272x300.jpg

394 ms

aortic01.jpg

aortic01.jpg

483 ms

Dr.-DeBakey.bmp

Dr.-DeBakey.bmp

504 ms

DL-e1426466594612.jpg

DL-e1426466594612.jpg

456 ms

Dr.-Stewart.jpg

Dr.-Stewart.jpg

484 ms

MIcracleman.jpg

MIcracleman.jpg

457 ms

d-1.gif

d-1.gif

455 ms

bg-send.gif

bg-send.gif

482 ms

btn-search.gif

btn-search.gif

483 ms

Ali.png

Ali.png

482 ms

Cedars.jpg

Cedars.jpg

520 ms

social_facebook_box_blue_16.png

social_facebook_box_blue_16.png

503 ms

social_twitter_box_blue_16.png

social_twitter_box_blue_16.png

502 ms

32x32.png

32x32.png

533 ms

V86VyqXbc09Sss3BPsMj1z8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff

V86VyqXbc09Sss3BPsMj1z8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff

298 ms

Yir4ZDsCn4g1kWopdg-ehHhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff

Yir4ZDsCn4g1kWopdg-ehHhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff

350 ms

count.js

count.js

423 ms

ga.js

ga.js

335 ms

button.0308b81ff1714e446f674b5b9793f2cd.js

button.0308b81ff1714e446f674b5b9793f2cd.js

114 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

112 ms

www-embed-player-vfl8xM8me.css

www-embed-player-vfl8xM8me.css

95 ms

www-embed-player.js

www-embed-player.js

112 ms

base.js

base.js

145 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

34 ms

follow_button.b9740740e0bcf9b0657c5b11bd4388da.en.html

follow_button.b9740740e0bcf9b0657c5b11bd4388da.en.html

53 ms

swfobject.js

swfobject.js

89 ms

fBnyGA8Aionz5086-mElmoOSPUuyQ1M9Un647_EjucU.js

fBnyGA8Aionz5086-mElmoOSPUuyQ1M9Un647_EjucU.js

9 ms

ad_status.js

ad_status.js

48 ms

2UX7WLTfW3W8TclTUvlFyQ.woff

2UX7WLTfW3W8TclTUvlFyQ.woff

44 ms

RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUT8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff

RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUT8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff

47 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

46 ms

Accessibility Review

aorticdissection.com accessibility score

87

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't have a <title> element

Best Practices

aorticdissection.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

aorticdissection.com SEO score

75

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't have a <title> element

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Aorticdissection.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Aorticdissection.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

aorticdissection.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Aorticdissection. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: