4.5 sec in total
730 ms
3.3 sec
417 ms
Click here to check amazing App Review content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about appreview.de
FileCalender: Anhänge für Termine. Server Tycoon. Barcode Wecker. Take: iOS Voice Recording. LookFor: Menschen finden.
Visit appreview.deWe analyzed Appreview.de page load time and found that the first response time was 730 ms and then it took 3.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
appreview.de performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.3 s
98/100
10%
Value1.3 s
100/100
25%
Value1.6 s
100/100
10%
Value0 ms
100/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value1.3 s
100/100
10%
730 ms
437 ms
206 ms
210 ms
323 ms
Our browser made a total of 132 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 29% of them (38 requests) were addressed to the original Appreview.de, 10% (13 requests) were made to Secure.flashtalking.com and 10% (13 requests) were made to Cdn.flashtalking.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Appreview.de.
Page size can be reduced by 816.8 kB (59%)
1.4 MB
572.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Appreview.de main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 895.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 31.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 31.8 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. App Review images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 616.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 616.4 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 165.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Appreview.de needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 165.6 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 84 (66%)
128
44
The browser has sent 128 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of App Review. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 56 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
appreview.de
730 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
437 ms
widget.css
206 ms
styles.css
210 ms
themify.framework.css
323 ms
themify-builder-style.css
526 ms
animate.min.css
727 ms
style.css
398 ms
media-queries.css
426 ms
css
25 ms
lightbox.css
522 ms
font-awesome.min.css
735 ms
jquery.js
1041 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
668 ms
video.js
925 ms
bigvideo.js
742 ms
themify.scroll-highlight.js
892 ms
show_ads.js
5 ms
jquery.form.min.js
749 ms
scripts.js
761 ms
carousel.min.js
1072 ms
themify.builder.module.plugins.js
1064 ms
waypoints.min.js
949 ms
themify.builder.script.js
1081 ms
themify.script.js
1024 ms
themify.gallery.js
1100 ms
lightbox.js
1263 ms
wp-embed.min.js
1204 ms
logo.png
500 ms
search.png
499 ms
rss.png
498 ms
filecalendar.jpg
653 ms
post-author.png
594 ms
post-category.png
605 ms
post-tag.png
730 ms
server-tycoon.jpg
1101 ms
barcode-wecker.png
731 ms
take-ios.jpg
1054 ms
lookfor.jpg
1151 ms
zrt_lookup.html
27 ms
show_ads_impl.js
46 ms
ads
156 ms
osd.js
42 ms
ads
164 ms
ads
180 ms
arrow-up.png
908 ms
192 ms
adj
72 ms
beacon
64 ms
202 ms
adj
181 ms
beacon
49 ms
26 ms
activityi;src=4236808;type=invmedia;cat=qk1cfvwl;ord=-1037791042
123 ms
activityi;src=4236808;type=invmedia;cat=aoyjbkr6;ord=-1037791042
130 ms
activityi;src=4236808;type=invmedia;cat=ijhardnr;ord=-1037791042
127 ms
activityi;src=4236808;type=invmedia;cat=4ztf2oue;ord=-1037791042
177 ms
0
206 ms
surly.js
114 ms
283 ms
verify_selector.js
268 ms
blank.gif
262 ms
59 ms
activityi;src=4236808;type=invmedia;cat=ijhardnr;ord=-210876354
153 ms
activityi;src=4236808;type=invmedia;cat=4ztf2oue;ord=-210876354
148 ms
activityi;src=4236808;type=invmedia;cat=qk1cfvwl;ord=-210876354
159 ms
activityi;src=4236808;type=invmedia;cat=aoyjbkr6;ord=-210876354
157 ms
index.html
377 ms
verify_selector.js
314 ms
bapi
221 ms
blank.gif
315 ms
ba.html
70 ms
pixel
77 ms
pixel
62 ms
4.gif
114 ms
lidar.js
81 ms
sbhK2lTE.js
149 ms
ds.png
482 ms
pixel
119 ms
pixel
117 ms
4311.js
62 ms
cTrvNaRi.html
11 ms
Tqng9ngJVK4Gqvh3e602hP-HqlN49KFEUSDtmrOPmWo.js
12 ms
j-1734607-1323377.js
311 ms
verifyr.js
88 ms
sd
137 ms
beacon.js
151 ms
dbapi
125 ms
0
119 ms
bg.png
131 ms
adchoices.en.png
128 ms
FaceBody_300x250_logo.gif
123 ms
FaceBody_300x250_bg.jpg
150 ms
index.html
40 ms
dvtp_src.js
85 ms
dt
236 ms
verifyr.js
38 ms
style.css
58 ms
html5API.js
229 ms
library.js
205 ms
main.js
76 ms
dt
225 ms
0
46 ms
dvtp_src_internal26.js
47 ms
css
192 ms
t2tv7.html
232 ms
visit.js
165 ms
sc.bci
121 ms
box_19_top-right.png
105 ms
ci.png
102 ms
i_btn_redeem.gif
107 ms
i_btn_zip.gif
42 ms
manifest.js
33 ms
i_bg.jpg
42 ms
i_discount.png
41 ms
i_logo.png
41 ms
i_separator.png
56 ms
avs5639.js
17 ms
1323377.json
17 ms
event.jpg
161 ms
storelocator.js
10 ms
list.js
11 ms
984.js
17 ms
163.js
21 ms
982.js
23 ms
811.js
30 ms
13.js
30 ms
249.js
28 ms
773.js
21 ms
222.js
31 ms
397.js
70 ms
366.js
29 ms
appreview.de accessibility score
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
appreview.de best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
appreview.de SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
DE
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Appreview.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed German language. Our system also found out that Appreview.de main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
appreview.de
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of App Review. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: