1.6 sec in total
69 ms
1.4 sec
167 ms
Visit archivalmethods.com now to see the best up-to-date Archival Methods content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about archivalmethods.com
We offer premium archival supplies, including document storage boxes and other acid-free solutions. Browse document and photo preservation supplies here.
Visit archivalmethods.comWe analyzed Archivalmethods.com page load time and found that the first response time was 69 ms and then it took 1.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
archivalmethods.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.3 s
41/100
10%
Value9.1 s
1/100
25%
Value7.3 s
28/100
10%
Value1,900 ms
8/100
30%
Value0.078
95/100
15%
Value21.8 s
1/100
10%
69 ms
328 ms
28 ms
18 ms
16 ms
Our browser made a total of 113 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 83% of them (94 requests) were addressed to the original Archivalmethods.com, 2% (2 requests) were made to Seal.thawte.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Sealserver.trustwave.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (400 ms) relates to the external source Seal.thawte.com.
Page size can be reduced by 141.5 kB (50%)
281.8 kB
140.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Archivalmethods.com main page is 281.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 119.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 53.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 53.3 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 9.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Archival Methods needs image optimization as it can save up to 9.6 kB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 61.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 61.7 kB or 52% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 16.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Archivalmethods.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 16.9 kB or 79% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 63 (59%)
107
44
The browser has sent 107 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Archival Methods. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
index.cfm
69 ms
www.archivalmethods.com
328 ms
cfform.js
28 ms
masks.js
18 ms
javascript_functions.js
16 ms
general_styles.css
32 ms
slideShow.css
17 ms
menu.css
36 ms
jquery.min.js
85 ms
slideShow.js
36 ms
menu.js
35 ms
other.js
35 ms
brafton_news_ticker.js
44 ms
brafton_ticker_styles.css
35 ms
css
70 ms
tab.css
47 ms
tab.js
42 ms
js.php
224 ms
getthawteseal
51 ms
seal.js
265 ms
cm.min.js
53 ms
seal.js
27 ms
headlogo_0.gif
40 ms
head_archmeth.gif
15 ms
banner_mat.gif
14 ms
Banner_Wood_Frame_Kits.gif
16 ms
Blog_News1.gif
33 ms
Banner_Mobile.gif
19 ms
head_textline1.gif
16 ms
search_word.gif
16 ms
go_0.gif
17 ms
menu_leftEnd.png
19 ms
menu_m.png
17 ms
menu_dropdown_bg.png
18 ms
menu_level2_item_parent.gif
19 ms
menu_level2_item.gif
22 ms
menu_rightEnd.png
23 ms
LN_cart_bkg.gif
24 ms
LN_help_bkg.gif
25 ms
LN_sale_bkg.gif
26 ms
spacer.gif
26 ms
social.gif
28 ms
hm_portcase(2)_0.jpg
32 ms
hm_boxes(2)_0.jpg
30 ms
hm_bindersalbums(2)_0.jpg
32 ms
hm_enclosures(2)_0.jpg
33 ms
hm_kit(2)_0.jpg
33 ms
hm_digital(2)_0.jpg
35 ms
hm_frames(2)_0.jpg
37 ms
hm_boards(2)_0.jpg
46 ms
2016_AM_Catalog.jpg
46 ms
arrow.gif
47 ms
secure90x72.gif
8 ms
getthawteseal
400 ms
seal_image.php
32 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3SZ2oysoEQEeKwjgmXLRnTc.ttf
72 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSpS3E-kSBmtLoNJPDtbj2Pk.ttf
93 ms
analytics.js
26 ms
menu_level1_item.png
25 ms
collect
14 ms
collect
71 ms
seal.php
73 ms
ga-audiences
33 ms
roundtrip.js
21 ms
request_1.gif
16 ms
request_hit.gif
15 ms
icon_hit.gif
16 ms
icon_1.gif
16 ms
go_hit.gif
17 ms
go_1.gif
19 ms
tm_portfolio_hit.gif
25 ms
tm_portfolio_1.gif
26 ms
tm_cases_hit.gif
26 ms
tm_cases_1.gif
27 ms
tm_boxes_hit.gif
29 ms
tm_boxes_1.gif
29 ms
tm_binders_hit.gif
30 ms
tm_binders_1.gif
32 ms
tm_envelopes_hit.gif
31 ms
tm_envelopes_1.gif
35 ms
tm_kits_hit.gif
35 ms
tm_kits_1.gif
34 ms
tm_sleeves_hit.gif
34 ms
tm_sleeves_1.gif
34 ms
tm_board_hit.gif
34 ms
tm_board_1.gif
36 ms
LN_cart_1.gif
37 ms
LN_cart_hit.gif
38 ms
LN_help_1.gif
38 ms
LN_help_hit.gif
39 ms
LN_register_1.gif
40 ms
LN_register_hit.gif
42 ms
LN_institutional_1.gif
43 ms
LN_institutional_hit.gif
44 ms
LN_about_1.gif
45 ms
LN_about_hit.gif
47 ms
LN_bids_1.gif
47 ms
LN_bids_hit.gif
48 ms
LN_imprints_1.gif
49 ms
LN_imprints_hit.gif
50 ms
LN_archivery_1.gif
49 ms
LN_archivery_hit.gif
49 ms
LN_customer_1.gif
50 ms
LN_customer_hit.gif
63 ms
LN_track_1.gif
61 ms
LN_track_hit.gif
56 ms
LN_site_1.gif
52 ms
LN_site_hit.gif
52 ms
LN_catalog_1.gif
49 ms
LN_catalog_hit.gif
52 ms
LN_sale_1.gif
52 ms
LN_sale_hit.gif
48 ms
5ZWHVOLZRNDVPAEIA32ESM.js
202 ms
archivalmethods.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents
ARIA input fields do not have accessible names
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
archivalmethods.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
archivalmethods.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Archivalmethods.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Archivalmethods.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
archivalmethods.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Archival Methods. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: