2.2 sec in total
542 ms
1.5 sec
139 ms
Click here to check amazing Armt content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about armt.com
Managing the complexity of crop insurance through proactive and innovative solutions that blend extensive agribusiness experience with insurance expertise and high-tech software development.
Visit armt.comWe analyzed Armt.com page load time and found that the first response time was 542 ms and then it took 1.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
armt.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.0 s
48/100
10%
Value99.2 s
0/100
25%
Value5.3 s
57/100
10%
Value2,240 ms
6/100
30%
Value0.013
100/100
15%
Value9.5 s
30/100
10%
542 ms
168 ms
119 ms
169 ms
234 ms
Our browser made a total of 55 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 95% of them (52 requests) were addressed to the original Armt.com, 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Armt.websol.barchart.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (542 ms) belongs to the original domain Armt.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.1 MB (58%)
1.9 MB
816.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Armt.com main page is 1.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 62.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 62.6 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 613.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Armt needs image optimization as it can save up to 613.2 kB or 48% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 409.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 409.3 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 47.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Armt.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 47.6 kB or 81% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 26 (49%)
53
27
The browser has sent 53 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Armt. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
armt.com
542 ms
main.css
168 ms
barchart_etc.css
119 ms
cufon-yui.js
169 ms
Myriad_Pro_400.font.js
234 ms
jquery-1.9.1.js
349 ms
jquery-migrate-1.2.1.js
176 ms
jquery.fancybox.js
225 ms
jquery.fancybox.pack.js
247 ms
jquery.fancybox-media.js
245 ms
jquery.fancybox.css
244 ms
dropdown.js
271 ms
jquery.cycle.all.js
341 ms
WebResource.axd
249 ms
WebResource.axd
252 ms
snapshot.php
45 ms
background.jpg
261 ms
top_filler.jpg
89 ms
logo.png
88 ms
SocialMedia_07.png
88 ms
SocialMedia_06.png
85 ms
SocialMedia_08.png
86 ms
SocialMedia_05.png
85 ms
SocialMedia_04.png
144 ms
SocialMedia_03.png
167 ms
LW-MappingBanner.png
249 ms
2015%2011_September%20web%20banner_dependable%20claim%20serv.png
253 ms
2015%2003_April%20web%20banner_clear%20choice.png
490 ms
2014%2012_December%20web%20banner_considering%20a%20change.png
303 ms
2014%2010_October%20web%20banner_outweighs%20competition%20new.png
266 ms
ARMtools.jpg
241 ms
rpp_icon.png
321 ms
advantage_icon.png
328 ms
_RSS_smLogo.png
321 ms
newsletter_icon.png
326 ms
general_store_icon.png
370 ms
barchart_icon.png
381 ms
container_bg_960.png
268 ms
upper_nav_left.jpg
285 ms
upper_nav_background.jpg
287 ms
upper_nav_right.jpg
342 ms
main_content_background.jpg
325 ms
subnav_link_off.jpg
318 ms
SocialMedia_02.png
364 ms
SocialMedia.png
493 ms
slideshow_text_bg.png
328 ms
slideshow_more.png
342 ms
more_link.png
331 ms
footer_background_960.png
353 ms
ga.js
29 ms
slidenav-active.png
331 ms
slidenav.png
364 ms
__utm.gif
30 ms
mobile.css
54 ms
print.css
57 ms
armt.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
armt.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
armt.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't use legible font sizes
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Armt.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Armt.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
armt.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Armt. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: