6.1 sec in total
178 ms
3.8 sec
2.2 sec
Click here to check amazing Arrangingpixels content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about arrangingpixels.com
Running a Small Business? Get Big City ad agency look on an small business budget. Logos, Business Cards, Wordpress Websites & more
Visit arrangingpixels.comWe analyzed Arrangingpixels.com page load time and found that the first response time was 178 ms and then it took 6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
arrangingpixels.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.0 s
10/100
10%
Value10.7 s
0/100
25%
Value8.7 s
16/100
10%
Value3,410 ms
2/100
30%
Value0.04
99/100
15%
Value18.8 s
3/100
10%
178 ms
336 ms
360 ms
233 ms
333 ms
Our browser made a total of 82 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Arrangingpixels.com, 60% (49 requests) were made to Brandco.com and 13% (11 requests) were made to Use.typekit.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) relates to the external source Js.hsadspixel.net.
Page size can be reduced by 216.5 kB (14%)
1.5 MB
1.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Arrangingpixels.com main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 85% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 202.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 202.8 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 13.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Arrangingpixels images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 102 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 54 (79%)
68
14
The browser has sent 68 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Arrangingpixels. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 43 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
arrangingpixels.com
178 ms
www.brandco.com
336 ms
brandco.com
360 ms
ltf3dpt.js
233 ms
js
333 ms
style.min.css
300 ms
frontend.min.css
166 ms
flatpickr.min.css
292 ms
select2.min.css
639 ms
style.css
562 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
253 ms
frontend-legacy.min.css
267 ms
frontend.min.css
329 ms
frontend.min.css
355 ms
all.min.css
476 ms
v4-shims.min.css
482 ms
frontend-gtag.min.js
613 ms
jquery.min.js
558 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
558 ms
flatpickr.min.js
558 ms
select2.min.js
687 ms
v4-shims.min.js
752 ms
v2.js
263 ms
animations.min.css
749 ms
441584.js
273 ms
frontend.min.js
748 ms
modernizr.js
897 ms
scripts.js
676 ms
jquery.mixitup.min.js
781 ms
typed.js
781 ms
webpack-pro.runtime.min.js
783 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
783 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
781 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
893 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
893 ms
hooks.min.js
891 ms
i18n.min.js
855 ms
frontend.min.js
856 ms
waypoints.min.js
860 ms
core.min.js
862 ms
swiper.min.js
861 ms
share-link.min.js
858 ms
441584.js
276 ms
dialog.min.js
868 ms
frontend.min.js
768 ms
css
441 ms
preloaded-elements-handlers.min.js
659 ms
preloaded-modules.min.js
647 ms
jquery.sticky.min.js
649 ms
lazyload.min.js
630 ms
analytics.js
379 ms
homepage_01.jpg
131 ms
i
108 ms
i
113 ms
i
111 ms
i
111 ms
collect
84 ms
collect
821 ms
json
656 ms
441584.js
941 ms
441584.js
942 ms
collectedforms.js
625 ms
conversations-embed.js
701 ms
fb.js
1057 ms
ga-audiences
802 ms
json
306 ms
property-press-logo@2x.png
794 ms
homepage_03.jpg
532 ms
i
292 ms
i
290 ms
i
290 ms
i
290 ms
i
530 ms
i
530 ms
bco_home_featured_bg2.jpg
290 ms
bco_home_featured_device.png
658 ms
HomepageGraphic_PP_06.png
525 ms
HomepageGraphic_PP_03.png
747 ms
acsb.js
591 ms
enterprise.js
475 ms
recaptcha__ca.js
38 ms
app.js
212 ms
arrangingpixels.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
arrangingpixels.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
arrangingpixels.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Arrangingpixels.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Arrangingpixels.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
arrangingpixels.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Arrangingpixels. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: