Tools & Wizards About Us
ascendercorp.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 24

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    43% of other websites

  • 89

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 72% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 76

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    35% of websites

ascendercorp.com

Font & Technology Specialists | Monotype.

Page Load Speed

2.7 sec in total

First Response

133 ms

Resources Loaded

1.9 sec

Page Rendered

614 ms

ascendercorp.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to ascendercorp.com homepage info - get ready to check Ascendercorp best content right away, or after learning these important things about ascendercorp.com

Explore Monotype fonts and the innovative technologies that bring words to page and screen. Discover our library of over 20,000 classic and new fonts.

Visit ascendercorp.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Ascendercorp.com page load time and found that the first response time was 133 ms and then it took 2.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

ascendercorp.com performance score

24

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

42/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.4 s

2/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.0 s

22/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,530 ms

13/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.107

88/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value65.0 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

ascendercorp.com

133 ms

www.monotype.com

254 ms

styles.css

47 ms

a46738bf-f9ef-4754-a3f9-06054ffbeddc.css

185 ms

71feb4d7-37ca-4e03-8506-747fb5c0a9f6.css

215 ms

Our browser made a total of 25 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 4% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Ascendercorp.com, 44% (11 requests) were made to Monotype.com and 12% (3 requests) were made to Fast.fonts.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (254 ms) relates to the external source Monotype.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 677.3 kB (85%)

Content Size

793.5 kB

After Optimization

116.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Ascendercorp.com main page is 793.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 494.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 57.8 kB

  • Original 65.8 kB
  • After minification 54.7 kB
  • After compression 8.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 11.1 kB, which is 17% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 57.8 kB or 88% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-91%

Potential reduce by 13.5 kB

  • Original 14.9 kB
  • After minification 1.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Ascendercorp needs image optimization as it can save up to 13.5 kB or 91% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-66%

Potential reduce by 145.0 kB

  • Original 218.1 kB
  • After minification 187.1 kB
  • After compression 73.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 145.0 kB or 66% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-93%

Potential reduce by 461.0 kB

  • Original 494.6 kB
  • After minification 492.2 kB
  • After compression 33.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ascendercorp.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 461.0 kB or 93% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 7 (44%)

Requests Now

16

After Optimization

9

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 16 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ascendercorp. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

ascendercorp.com

ascendercorp.com

133 ms

www.monotype.com

www.monotype.com

254 ms

styles.css

styles.css

47 ms

a46738bf-f9ef-4754-a3f9-06054ffbeddc.css

a46738bf-f9ef-4754-a3f9-06054ffbeddc.css

185 ms

71feb4d7-37ca-4e03-8506-747fb5c0a9f6.css

71feb4d7-37ca-4e03-8506-747fb5c0a9f6.css

215 ms

jquery-1.11.2.min.js

jquery-1.11.2.min.js

153 ms

jquery.validate.min.js

jquery.validate.min.js

146 ms

Common.js

Common.js

148 ms

jvfloat.min.js

jvfloat.min.js

151 ms

responsive-nav.min.js

responsive-nav.min.js

149 ms

monotype.js

monotype.js

150 ms

select.png

select.png

97 ms

checkbox-inactive.png

checkbox-inactive.png

88 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

129 ms

activityi;src=5076634;type=retar0;cat=retar0;dc_lat=;dc_rdid=;tag_for_child_directed_treatment=;ord=4960185810923.576

activityi;src=5076634;type=retar0;cat=retar0;dc_lat=;dc_rdid=;tag_for_child_directed_treatment=;ord=4960185810923.576

187 ms

7408a6fc-f1ee-40e4-abce-996fb9d3b2bd.woff

7408a6fc-f1ee-40e4-abce-996fb9d3b2bd.woff

59 ms

020eb584-be68-4b6c-86cd-412f19e09987.woff

020eb584-be68-4b6c-86cd-412f19e09987.woff

63 ms

collect

collect

44 ms

collect

collect

136 ms

ga-audiences

ga-audiences

132 ms

pixel

pixel

85 ms

google

google

7 ms

generic

generic

9 ms

match

match

6 ms

nr-885.min.js

nr-885.min.js

43 ms

Accessibility Review

ascendercorp.com accessibility score

89

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

ascendercorp.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

ascendercorp.com SEO score

76

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ascendercorp.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Ascendercorp.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

ascendercorp.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ascendercorp. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: