8 sec in total
1.6 sec
6.2 sec
229 ms
Visit atcost1.com now to see the best up-to-date Atcost 1 content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about atcost1.com
Internal Error
Visit atcost1.comWe analyzed Atcost1.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.6 sec and then it took 6.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
atcost1.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.3 s
18/100
10%
Value7.2 s
5/100
25%
Value7.9 s
22/100
10%
Value60 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.249
50/100
15%
Value7.2 s
51/100
10%
1561 ms
135 ms
541 ms
317 ms
63 ms
Our browser made a total of 63 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 25% of them (16 requests) were addressed to the original Atcost1.com, 60% (38 requests) were made to Wac.675e.edgecastcdn.net and 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.2 sec) relates to the external source Wac.675e.edgecastcdn.net.
Page size can be reduced by 768.4 kB (29%)
2.7 MB
1.9 MB
In fact, the total size of Atcost1.com main page is 2.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 54.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 9.1 kB, which is 14% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 54.0 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 297.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Atcost 1 needs image optimization as it can save up to 297.4 kB or 14% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 283.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 283.2 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 133.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Atcost1.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 133.8 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 8 (14%)
59
51
The browser has sent 59 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Atcost 1. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
atcost1.com
1561 ms
ProductButtons-0.css
135 ms
starterLayoutCSS-0.css
541 ms
starterLayoutJQuery-0.js
317 ms
print.css
63 ms
analytics.js
8 ms
starterLayoutJS-0.js
259 ms
starterLayoutVendorJS-0.js
133 ms
logo.png
35 ms
embed
3639 ms
0664afa7-3709-4339-9a30-28631c4d489e.png
3725 ms
5ef753da-9efb-4057-9954-47e167a62d3f.png
3687 ms
713b7e99-a68e-4944-846e-d5306c64990b.png
3660 ms
6065cdb6-10ef-446e-a76d-9b4666ec759b.png
3727 ms
74ffc193-afe0-4e6a-b496-f8b6a4c0728f.png
3723 ms
150.png
3635 ms
150.png
3636 ms
150.png
3654 ms
150.png
3686 ms
150.png
3683 ms
150.png
3718 ms
150.png
3718 ms
150.png
3719 ms
150.png
3742 ms
150.png
3741 ms
44249.front.ffffff.150.gif
3736 ms
1000202.front.ffffff.150.gif
3868 ms
1000096.front.ffffff.150.gif
3744 ms
1000034.front.ffffff.150.gif
3744 ms
1000219.front.ffffff.150.gif
3762 ms
1000001.front.ffffff.150.gif
3761 ms
1000239.front.ffffff.150.gif
3882 ms
1000166.front.ffffff.150.gif
3895 ms
1000058.front.ffffff.150.gif
3770 ms
1000133.front.ffffff.150.gif
3786 ms
1000157.front.ffffff.150.gif
3786 ms
1000007.front.ffffff.150.gif
3799 ms
1000150.front.ffffff.150.gif
3812 ms
1000237.front.ffffff.150.gif
3984 ms
1000098.front.ffffff.150.gif
3949 ms
1000228.front.ffffff.150.gif
3956 ms
1000112.front.ffffff.150.gif
4045 ms
1000191.front.ffffff.150.gif
3904 ms
1000240.front.ffffff.150.gif
4180 ms
1000128.front.ffffff.150.gif
3930 ms
close.png
3619 ms
loading.gif
3619 ms
prev.png
3618 ms
next.png
3618 ms
ds-thumb.png
3617 ms
loader.gif
3618 ms
icon-sprite.png
3722 ms
Montserrat-Regular.woff
3753 ms
Robotoslab-Light.woff
3714 ms
CachedPage_v2.js
3940 ms
st.js
3538 ms
CachedPage_v2.js
3710 ms
collect
3515 ms
collect
3579 ms
99 ms
js
56 ms
init_embed.js
43 ms
ga-audiences
36 ms
atcost1.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
atcost1.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
atcost1.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Atcost1.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Atcost1.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
atcost1.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Atcost 1. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: