Tools & Wizards About Us
axetalk.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 51

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    69% of other websites

  • 96

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 89% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    71% of websites

axetalk.com

Page Load Speed

2 sec in total

First Response

264 ms

Resources Loaded

1.5 sec

Page Rendered

188 ms

axetalk.com screenshot

About Website

Visit axetalk.com now to see the best up-to-date Axetalk content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about axetalk.com

AxeTalk guitar forum

Visit axetalk.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Axetalk.com page load time and found that the first response time was 264 ms and then it took 1.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

axetalk.com performance score

51

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.5 s

69/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.1 s

76/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.1 s

79/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value4,080 ms

1/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.5 s

23/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

axetalk.com

264 ms

combo

8 ms

vbulletin-core.js

103 ms

main-rollup.css

119 ms

additional.css

73 ms

Our browser made a total of 89 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 21% of them (19 requests) were addressed to the original Axetalk.com, 4% (4 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 4% (4 requests) were made to Cm.g.doubleclick.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (285 ms) relates to the external source Securepubads.g.doubleclick.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 628.4 kB (63%)

Content Size

1.0 MB

After Optimization

372.5 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Axetalk.com main page is 1.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 717.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 92.6 kB

  • Original 126.4 kB
  • After minification 121.2 kB
  • After compression 33.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 92.6 kB or 73% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 11.1 kB

  • Original 81.5 kB
  • After minification 70.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Axetalk needs image optimization as it can save up to 11.1 kB or 14% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-64%

Potential reduce by 461.9 kB

  • Original 717.0 kB
  • After minification 702.7 kB
  • After compression 255.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 461.9 kB or 64% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 62.8 kB

  • Original 76.0 kB
  • After minification 74.6 kB
  • After compression 13.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Axetalk.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 62.8 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 58 (75%)

Requests Now

77

After Optimization

19

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 77 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Axetalk. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 29 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

axetalk.com

axetalk.com

264 ms

combo

combo

8 ms

vbulletin-core.js

vbulletin-core.js

103 ms

main-rollup.css

main-rollup.css

119 ms

additional.css

additional.css

73 ms

adv_portal.css

adv_portal.css

73 ms

vbulletin_md5.js

vbulletin_md5.js

74 ms

vbulletin_md5.js

vbulletin_md5.js

72 ms

ggv2.js

ggv2.js

16 ms

gpt.js

gpt.js

7 ms

pubads_impl_82.js

pubads_impl_82.js

6 ms

container.html

container.html

81 ms

ga.js

ga.js

79 ms

gradient-grey-down.png

gradient-grey-down.png

79 ms

ads

ads

285 ms

quant.js

quant.js

54 ms

get

get

55 ms

AT-LOGONEW.png

AT-LOGONEW.png

48 ms

newbtn_middle.png

newbtn_middle.png

45 ms

selected-tab-gradient-with-top-alpha.png

selected-tab-gradient-with-top-alpha.png

45 ms

arrow.png

arrow.png

46 ms

search.png

search.png

46 ms

navbit-home.png

navbit-home.png

47 ms

collapse.png

collapse.png

71 ms

lastpost-right.png

lastpost-right.png

73 ms

poll_posticon.gif

poll_posticon.gif

76 ms

generic_button.png

generic_button.png

77 ms

cron.php

cron.php

163 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

12 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

14 ms

pixel;r=579135768;a=p-48WZaqz1yStXk;fpan=1;fpa=P0-79240744-1458462901651;ns=0;ce=1;cm=;je=0;sr=1024x768x32;enc=n;dst=0;et=1458462901651;tzo=-180;ref=;url=http%3A%2F%2Faxetalk.com%2F;ogl=

pixel;r=579135768;a=p-48WZaqz1yStXk;fpan=1;fpa=P0-79240744-1458462901651;ns=0;ce=1;cm=;je=0;sr=1024x768x32;enc=n;dst=0;et=1458462901651;tzo=-180;ref=;url=http%3A%2F%2Faxetalk.com%2F;ogl=

6 ms

p-00TsOkvHvnsZU.gif

p-00TsOkvHvnsZU.gif

34 ms

p2

p2

9 ms

33 ms

net.php

net.php

9 ms

pixel

pixel

43 ms

generic

generic

38 ms

generic

generic

7 ms

ads

ads

194 ms

xrefid.xgi

xrefid.xgi

6 ms

pixel.gif

pixel.gif

97 ms

pixel.gif

pixel.gif

65 ms

bk-static.js

bk-static.js

32 ms

pixel.gif

pixel.gif

43 ms

xrefid.xgi

xrefid.xgi

13 ms

4651

4651

42 ms

pixel

pixel

16 ms

gif

gif

18 ms

image.sbxx

image.sbxx

42 ms

2981

2981

47 ms

expansion_embed.js

expansion_embed.js

16 ms

ads

ads

220 ms

bsredirect5.js

bsredirect5.js

75 ms

ca

ca

172 ms

adj

adj

171 ms

osd.js

osd.js

21 ms

beacon

beacon

169 ms

image.sbxx

image.sbxx

64 ms

19505

19505

38 ms

bst2tv3.html

bst2tv3.html

104 ms

verifyc.js

verifyc.js

29 ms

itag.js

itag.js

54 ms

dvtp_src.js

dvtp_src.js

82 ms

4586

4586

80 ms

3292.js

3292.js

210 ms

Amtrak_LD_FY16_Fares_Pairs_NY_DC_SF_300x250.jpg

Amtrak_LD_FY16_Fares_Pairs_NY_DC_SF_300x250.jpg

207 ms

51344004

51344004

204 ms

B9057192.127197769;dc_trk_aid=300234608;dc_trk_cid=68114564;ord=1045631400;dc_lat=;dc_rdid=;tag_for_child_directed_treatment=

B9057192.127197769;dc_trk_aid=300234608;dc_trk_cid=68114564;ord=1045631400;dc_lat=;dc_rdid=;tag_for_child_directed_treatment=

186 ms

dvtp_src_internal26.js

dvtp_src_internal26.js

24 ms

cap

cap

132 ms

pixel

pixel

176 ms

lidar.js

lidar.js

19 ms

sbhK2lTE.js

sbhK2lTE.js

18 ms

142d6b8c9dd2afdd59660116d2b719b6_1.html

142d6b8c9dd2afdd59660116d2b719b6_1.html

149 ms

t2tv7.html

t2tv7.html

122 ms

visit.js

visit.js

85 ms

cTrvNaRi.html

cTrvNaRi.html

37 ms

Tqng9ngJVK4Gqvh3e602hP-HqlN49KFEUSDtmrOPmWo.js

Tqng9ngJVK4Gqvh3e602hP-HqlN49KFEUSDtmrOPmWo.js

48 ms

st.v2.js

st.v2.js

79 ms

pixel

pixel

32 ms

pixel

pixel

65 ms

51344004

51344004

47 ms

avs583.js

avs583.js

44 ms

event.gif

event.gif

29 ms

6c100b4423c4cf40add466f93a867f0f.jpg

6c100b4423c4cf40add466f93a867f0f.jpg

9 ms

event.jpg

event.jpg

26 ms

gr

gr

35 ms

sd

sd

6 ms

pixel_details.html

pixel_details.html

4 ms

Accessibility Review

axetalk.com accessibility score

96

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

axetalk.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

axetalk.com SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Axetalk.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Axetalk.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

axetalk.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Axetalk. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: