Tools & Wizards About Us
beef.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 75

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    84% of other websites

  • 93

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 82% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    95% of websites

beef.com

The Global Gateway to Beef

Page Load Speed

1000 ms in total

First Response

334 ms

Resources Loaded

541 ms

Page Rendered

125 ms

beef.com screenshot

About Website

Visit beef.com now to see the best up-to-date Beef content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about beef.com

Visit beef.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Beef.com page load time and found that the first response time was 334 ms and then it took 666 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

beef.com performance score

75

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.3 s

73/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.2 s

23/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.3 s

98/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value90 ms

98/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.02

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.1 s

75/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

beef.com

334 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

40 ms

styles.css

38 ms

main.min.css

36 ms

css

65 ms

Our browser made a total of 19 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 5% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Beef.com, 68% (13 requests) were made to Beef.recordingcities.com and 11% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (334 ms) belongs to the original domain Beef.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 166.5 kB (65%)

Content Size

256.5 kB

After Optimization

90.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Beef.com main page is 256.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 184.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-69%

Potential reduce by 7.8 kB

  • Original 11.2 kB
  • After minification 10.9 kB
  • After compression 3.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 7.8 kB or 69% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 7.3 kB
  • After minification 7.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Beef images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-61%

Potential reduce by 113.2 kB

  • Original 184.2 kB
  • After minification 181.6 kB
  • After compression 71.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 113.2 kB or 61% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 45.6 kB

  • Original 53.8 kB
  • After minification 43.1 kB
  • After compression 8.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Beef.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 45.6 kB or 85% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (69%)

Requests Now

16

After Optimization

5

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 16 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Beef. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

beef.com

beef.com

334 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

40 ms

styles.css

styles.css

38 ms

main.min.css

main.min.css

36 ms

css

css

65 ms

style.css

style.css

32 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

43 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

36 ms

jquery.form.min.js

jquery.form.min.js

36 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

37 ms

navigation.js

navigation.js

37 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

40 ms

style.css

style.css

12 ms

ga.js

ga.js

49 ms

cropped-Beef.com-Logo-300x113.jpg

cropped-Beef.com-Logo-300x113.jpg

46 ms

ajax-loader.gif

ajax-loader.gif

30 ms

u-WUoqrET9fUeobQW7jkRbO3LdcAZYWl9Si6vvxL-qU.woff

u-WUoqrET9fUeobQW7jkRbO3LdcAZYWl9Si6vvxL-qU.woff

59 ms

k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzOY5mlVXtdNkpsMpKkrDXP4.woff

k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzOY5mlVXtdNkpsMpKkrDXP4.woff

70 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

13 ms

Accessibility Review

beef.com accessibility score

93

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

beef.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

beef.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Beef.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Beef.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

beef.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Beef. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: