Report Summary

  • 53

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    71% of other websites

  • 92

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 80% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

betterbee.net

Beekeeping Supplies & Education | Betterbee

Page Load Speed

4.2 sec in total

First Response

1.2 sec

Resources Loaded

2.8 sec

Page Rendered

320 ms

betterbee.net screenshot

About Website

Visit betterbee.net now to see the best up-to-date Betterbee content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about betterbee.net

Since 1979, Betterbee has supplied beekeepers across the country, from beginners to experts, with the tools and knowledge they need to succeed.

Visit betterbee.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Betterbee.net page load time and found that the first response time was 1.2 sec and then it took 3.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

betterbee.net performance score

53

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.8 s

27/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.9 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.1 s

45/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value190 ms

91/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.8 s

36/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.betterbee.com

1154 ms

bootstrap.css

42 ms

products.css

89 ms

main.css

92 ms

betterbee.css

86 ms

Our browser made a total of 53 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Betterbee.net, 9% (5 requests) were made to and 6% (3 requests) were made to Netdna.bootstrapcdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) relates to the external source Betterbee.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 591.7 kB (39%)

Content Size

1.5 MB

After Optimization

909.5 kB

In fact, the total size of Betterbee.net main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 819.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 99.2 kB

  • Original 125.1 kB
  • After minification 118.6 kB
  • After compression 25.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 99.2 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 76.3 kB

  • Original 819.7 kB
  • After minification 743.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Betterbee images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-70%

Potential reduce by 233.9 kB

  • Original 336.5 kB
  • After minification 329.6 kB
  • After compression 102.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 233.9 kB or 70% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 182.3 kB

  • Original 219.9 kB
  • After minification 198.0 kB
  • After compression 37.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Betterbee.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 182.3 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 16 (36%)

Requests Now

45

After Optimization

29

The browser has sent 45 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Betterbee. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

betterbee.net accessibility score

92

Accessibility Issues

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

betterbee.net best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

betterbee.net SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Betterbee.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Betterbee.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Betterbee. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: