7.2 sec in total
77 ms
6.7 sec
463 ms
Click here to check amazing Bible content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about bible.us
Read God’s Word at anytime, anywhere using the YouVersion Bible App. Share Scripture with friends, highlight passages, and create a daily habit with Bible Plans.
Visit bible.usWe analyzed Bible.us page load time and found that the first response time was 77 ms and then it took 7.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
bible.us performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.2 s
8/100
10%
Value7.5 s
4/100
25%
Value8.5 s
17/100
10%
Value4,650 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.024
100/100
15%
Value21.5 s
1/100
10%
77 ms
678 ms
284 ms
69 ms
351 ms
Our browser made a total of 62 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Bible.us, 24% (15 requests) were made to Bible.com and 16% (10 requests) were made to Imageproxy.youversionapi.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.8 sec) relates to the external source Script.hotjar.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.1 MB (63%)
1.8 MB
659.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Bible.us main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. HTML takes 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 1.1 MB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 1.1 MB or 86% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Bible images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 293 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 0 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Bible.us has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 33 (60%)
55
22
The browser has sent 55 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Bible. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 26 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
bible.us
77 ms
www.bible.com
678 ms
gtm.js
284 ms
application-6bd15353b81348bbf67ce4a7fa99a965.css
69 ms
style.main.1305df54a016aa3c822fa1790414f5e9.css
351 ms
mgk8ovf.js
455 ms
application-b6be8b7b3f493a518a3748eea8adea69.js
244 ms
jquery.counter-d5ff14093c940f4a43831fa6492a23c6.js
242 ms
platform.js
630 ms
appleid.auth.js
669 ms
polyfill.min.js
914 ms
raven.min.js
980 ms
manifest.8d146df158510e128546.js
374 ms
vendor.44f41f518665e490aafb.js
1034 ms
Footer.d8aa0cf677a20b0a47f9.js
538 ms
Header.feed5562d6cfa4cbb51f.js
537 ms
CookieConsentBanner.b1c48b56335f1a0059d1.js
520 ms
Navigation.94886fd679fe94459fad.js
632 ms
sdk.js
876 ms
analytics.js
813 ms
hotjar-2168163.js
1686 ms
js
448 ms
en-66b75f79abc080b66cb2d914d4c3a676.png
473 ms
1280x1280.jpg
1571 ms
640x360.jpg
1572 ms
640x360.jpg
1572 ms
640x360.jpg
1572 ms
640x360.jpg
1572 ms
640x360.jpg
1569 ms
640x360.jpg
1708 ms
640x360.jpg
1707 ms
640x360.jpg
1707 ms
640x360.jpg
1706 ms
read-stroked-41e477a72144fc9a137e267e6e2c2b86.png
465 ms
highlight-stroked-72745d87679c9ad02169664b34c96677.png
464 ms
smartphone-stroked-18830a342d5c49c64e2bad37aacb46a3.png
464 ms
votd-3821aaf8da74121965977338d5262acf.svg
652 ms
share-ca3c1e70fc6b9dbd202937310a88c7b1.png
582 ms
mail-1ed9a31cd94860c164c844258493a63b.png
582 ms
plans-db867587f2c74bb5b04e681bdcfcd38d.svg
652 ms
mountain-range.jpg
1331 ms
d
382 ms
untitled-serif-web-regular.woff2
1109 ms
collect
998 ms
sdk.js
843 ms
invisible.js
351 ms
d
256 ms
d
256 ms
d
390 ms
modules.61e17720cf639c3e96a7.js
2776 ms
box-69edcc3187336f9b0a3fbb4c73be9fe6.html
2678 ms
collect
2710 ms
75492535ab485c53
80 ms
p.gif
88 ms
ga-audiences
40 ms
nr-1216.min.js
1015 ms
stats_jsonp.js
258 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
45 ms
collect
18 ms
NRJS-58050ae1d62ad8d5cb2
109 ms
iframe
72 ms
m=base
20 ms
bible.us accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
button, link, and menuitem elements do not have accessible names.
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
bible.us best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
bible.us SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Bible.us can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Bible.us main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
bible.us
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Bible. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: