Report Summary

  • 98

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    95% of other websites

  • 91

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 77% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 67

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    25% of websites

biblemapper.com

Bible Mapper - Home

Page Load Speed

1.8 sec in total

First Response

420 ms

Resources Loaded

1.2 sec

Page Rendered

144 ms

biblemapper.com screenshot

About Website

Visit biblemapper.com now to see the best up-to-date Bible Mapper content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about biblemapper.com

Visit biblemapper.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Biblemapper.com page load time and found that the first response time was 420 ms and then it took 1.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

biblemapper.com performance score

98

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.4 s

97/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.2 s

95/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value1.8 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value10 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value1.8 s

100/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

biblemapper.com

420 ms

default.css

133 ms

Jeru-temple_1.jpg

796 ms

whv2_001.js

28 ms

visit.gif

45 ms

Our browser made a total of 10 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 70% of them (7 requests) were addressed to the original Biblemapper.com, 10% (1 request) were made to L.yimg.com and 10% (1 request) were made to Visit.webhosting.yahoo.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (796 ms) belongs to the original domain Biblemapper.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 54.0 kB (14%)

Content Size

376.8 kB

After Optimization

322.8 kB

In fact, the total size of Biblemapper.com main page is 376.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 5% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 329.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-63%

Potential reduce by 3.0 kB

  • Original 4.7 kB
  • After minification 4.1 kB
  • After compression 1.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 589 B, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 3.0 kB or 63% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 17.7 kB

  • Original 329.0 kB
  • After minification 311.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Bible Mapper images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 28.2 kB

  • Original 36.6 kB
  • After minification 30.0 kB
  • After compression 8.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 28.2 kB or 77% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 5.1 kB

  • Original 6.5 kB
  • After minification 4.1 kB
  • After compression 1.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Biblemapper.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 5.1 kB or 79% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

9

After Optimization

9

The browser has sent 9 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Bible Mapper. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

biblemapper.com accessibility score

91

Accessibility Issues

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

biblemapper.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

biblemapper.com SEO score

67

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Biblemapper.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Biblemapper.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Bible Mapper. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: