Tools & Wizards About Us
biggsconstruction.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 50

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    68% of other websites

  • 54

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 23% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    71% of websites

biggsconstruction.com

Biggs Construction | Custom Home Builders | Greenville NC & Pitt County NC

Page Load Speed

4.2 sec in total

First Response

1.2 sec

Resources Loaded

2.4 sec

Page Rendered

589 ms

biggsconstruction.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to biggsconstruction.com homepage info - get ready to check Biggs Construction best content right away, or after learning these important things about biggsconstruction.com

Choose the experienced and trusted name in custom home builders in Pitt County NC, Greenville NC & Beaufort County NC. Call Biggs Construction!

Visit biggsconstruction.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Biggsconstruction.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.2 sec and then it took 3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

biggsconstruction.com performance score

50

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.6 s

31/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.6 s

60/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.6 s

17/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value240 ms

85/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.635

9/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.9 s

35/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

biggsconstruction.com

1201 ms

choices.min.css

13 ms

et-divi-customizer-global.min.css

11 ms

jquery.min.js

19 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

17 ms

Our browser made a total of 48 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 44% of them (21 requests) were addressed to the original Biggsconstruction.com, 50% (24 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Biggsconstruction.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 840.4 kB (11%)

Content Size

7.6 MB

After Optimization

6.8 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Biggsconstruction.com main page is 7.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 6.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 177.5 kB

  • Original 208.4 kB
  • After minification 207.1 kB
  • After compression 31.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 177.5 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 245.4 kB

  • Original 6.8 MB
  • After minification 6.6 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Biggs Construction images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-68%

Potential reduce by 291.2 kB

  • Original 429.2 kB
  • After minification 426.9 kB
  • After compression 138.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 291.2 kB or 68% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 126.4 kB

  • Original 145.4 kB
  • After minification 145.1 kB
  • After compression 19.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Biggsconstruction.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 126.4 kB or 87% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (45%)

Requests Now

22

After Optimization

12

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 22 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Biggs Construction. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

biggsconstruction.com

biggsconstruction.com

1201 ms

choices.min.css

choices.min.css

13 ms

et-divi-customizer-global.min.css

et-divi-customizer-global.min.css

11 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

19 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

17 ms

scripts.min.js

scripts.min.js

36 ms

magnific-popup.js

magnific-popup.js

32 ms

salvattore.js

salvattore.js

17 ms

common.js

common.js

17 ms

Screen-Shot-2016-06-07-at-2.32.18-PM.png

Screen-Shot-2016-06-07-at-2.32.18-PM.png

16 ms

new-house-400x284.jpg

new-house-400x284.jpg

32 ms

unnamed-1-400x284.jpg

unnamed-1-400x284.jpg

33 ms

duplex_kitchen-400x284.jpg

duplex_kitchen-400x284.jpg

32 ms

20180227_091046-400x284.jpg

20180227_091046-400x284.jpg

32 ms

Floorplan.gif

Floorplan.gif

33 ms

DSC_0224.jpg

DSC_0224.jpg

264 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

154 ms

grunge_wall.png

grunge_wall.png

20 ms

grid.png

grid.png

47 ms

modules.woff

modules.woff

11 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHw.woff

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHw.woff

43 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHA.ttf

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHA.ttf

44 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh50XSwiPHw.woff

S6u9w4BMUTPHh50XSwiPHw.woff

42 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh50XSwiPHA.ttf

S6u9w4BMUTPHh50XSwiPHA.ttf

43 ms

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWA.woff

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWA.woff

45 ms

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf

48 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHw.woff

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHw.woff

47 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHA.ttf

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHA.ttf

49 ms

S6u8w4BMUTPHh30AXC-s.woff

S6u8w4BMUTPHh30AXC-s.woff

51 ms

S6u8w4BMUTPHh30AXC-v.ttf

S6u8w4BMUTPHh30AXC-v.ttf

51 ms

tDbD2oWUg0MKqScQ6w.woff

tDbD2oWUg0MKqScQ6w.woff

52 ms

tDbD2oWUg0MKqScQ6A.ttf

tDbD2oWUg0MKqScQ6A.ttf

55 ms

tDbM2oWUg0MKoZw1-LPK9Q.woff

tDbM2oWUg0MKoZw1-LPK9Q.woff

60 ms

tDbM2oWUg0MKoZw1-LPK9g.ttf

tDbM2oWUg0MKoZw1-LPK9g.ttf

59 ms

S6u8w4BMUTPHjxsAXC-s.woff

S6u8w4BMUTPHjxsAXC-s.woff

60 ms

S6u8w4BMUTPHjxsAXC-v.ttf

S6u8w4BMUTPHjxsAXC-v.ttf

58 ms

S6u_w4BMUTPHjxsI9w2_Gwfr.woff

S6u_w4BMUTPHjxsI9w2_Gwfr.woff

60 ms

S6u_w4BMUTPHjxsI9w2_Gwfo.ttf

S6u_w4BMUTPHjxsI9w2_Gwfo.ttf

66 ms

S6u-w4BMUTPHjxsIPx-oPCQ.woff

S6u-w4BMUTPHjxsIPx-oPCQ.woff

66 ms

S6u-w4BMUTPHjxsIPx-oPCc.ttf

S6u-w4BMUTPHjxsIPx-oPCc.ttf

66 ms

S6u_w4BMUTPHjxsI5wq_Gwfr.woff

S6u_w4BMUTPHjxsI5wq_Gwfr.woff

66 ms

S6u_w4BMUTPHjxsI5wq_Gwfo.ttf

S6u_w4BMUTPHjxsI5wq_Gwfo.ttf

65 ms

S6u_w4BMUTPHjxsI3wi_Gwfr.woff

S6u_w4BMUTPHjxsI3wi_Gwfr.woff

94 ms

S6u_w4BMUTPHjxsI3wi_Gwfo.ttf

S6u_w4BMUTPHjxsI3wi_Gwfo.ttf

94 ms

collect

collect

22 ms

js

js

92 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

7 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

5 ms

Accessibility Review

biggsconstruction.com accessibility score

54

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

biggsconstruction.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

biggsconstruction.com SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Biggsconstruction.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Biggsconstruction.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

biggsconstruction.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Biggs Construction. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: