5.3 sec in total
770 ms
4.1 sec
389 ms
Visit birge.ru now to see the best up-to-date Birge content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about birge.ru
Бирге.ру разместить объявление. Поиск работы, аренда квартиры и многое другое. На Бирге вы найдете все!
Visit birge.ruWe analyzed Birge.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 770 ms and then it took 4.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
birge.ru performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.7 s
29/100
10%
Value12.5 s
0/100
25%
Value7.9 s
23/100
10%
Value910 ms
31/100
30%
Value0.123
83/100
15%
Value16.4 s
5/100
10%
770 ms
174 ms
317 ms
316 ms
318 ms
Our browser made a total of 51 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Birge.ru, 14% (7 requests) were made to Api-maps.yandex.ru and 4% (2 requests) were made to Bitrix.info. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) relates to the external source Other.birge.ru.
Page size can be reduced by 538.2 kB (54%)
1.0 MB
463.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Birge.ru main page is 1.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 495.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 174.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 174.5 kB or 88% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 123.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Birge needs image optimization as it can save up to 123.8 kB or 25% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 32.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 32.1 kB or 57% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 207.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Birge.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 207.7 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 34 (77%)
44
10
The browser has sent 44 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Birge. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
other.birge.ru
770 ms
ss.css
174 ms
core.min.css
317 ms
jquery.fancybox.css
316 ms
jquery.fancybox-buttons.css
318 ms
jquery.fancybox-thumbs.css
314 ms
bootstrap.min.css
475 ms
font-awesome.min.css
301 ms
jquery-ui.min.css
459 ms
style.css
491 ms
style.css
498 ms
popup.min.css
489 ms
style.min.css
487 ms
style.min.css
605 ms
style.css
611 ms
style.css
612 ms
776 ms
ss.js
618 ms
core.min.js
756 ms
core_ajax.min.js
618 ms
core_window.min.js
742 ms
jquery-1.4.4.min.js
1129 ms
bootstrap.min.js
752 ms
general.js
754 ms
jquery.mousewheel-3.0.6.pack.js
757 ms
jquery.fancybox.pack.js
1128 ms
jquery.fancybox-buttons.js
1150 ms
jquery.fancybox-media.js
1152 ms
jquery.fancybox-thumbs.js
1151 ms
jquery.sticky-kit.min.js
1152 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
1153 ms
css
124 ms
combine.js
848 ms
combine.js
843 ms
ba.js
283 ms
748859c99565f2363dbec568d46bd9c3.jpg
964 ms
logo.png
176 ms
categories.png
474 ms
de88399c72096198ce42d141ae4c1890.jpg
576 ms
367d21d1bb029904c6df1e50932f440d.jpg
614 ms
1180f3845111b328eea206b0cf3dd569.jpg
455 ms
46c9c9f939aa39957fdc952f07c1ee8c.jpg
345 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
593 ms
watch.js
51 ms
analytics.js
130 ms
collect
46 ms
bx_stat
235 ms
util_cursor_storage_grab.cur
245 ms
util_cursor_storage_grabbing.cur
239 ms
util_cursor_storage_help.cur
323 ms
util_cursor_storage_zoom_in.cur
349 ms
birge.ru accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA input fields do not have accessible names
Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.
[role]s are not contained by their required parent element
[aria-*] attributes do not have valid values
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
birge.ru best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
birge.ru SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
RU
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Birge.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Birge.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
birge.ru
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Birge. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: