3.2 sec in total
173 ms
2.9 sec
137 ms
Visit birmingham.io now to see the best up-to-date Birmingham content for United Kingdom and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about birmingham.io
Continue the discussion
Visit birmingham.ioWe analyzed Birmingham.io page load time and found that the first response time was 173 ms and then it took 3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
birmingham.io performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.9 s
1/100
10%
Value8.2 s
2/100
25%
Value7.9 s
23/100
10%
Value1,260 ms
19/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value8.6 s
37/100
10%
173 ms
588 ms
188 ms
272 ms
259 ms
Our browser made a total of 57 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Birmingham.io, 95% (54 requests) were made to Talk.birmingham.io and 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (897 ms) relates to the external source Talk.birmingham.io.
Page size can be reduced by 2.5 MB (78%)
3.2 MB
705.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Birmingham.io main page is 3.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 2.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 106.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 106.2 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 9.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Birmingham needs image optimization as it can save up to 9.2 kB or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 2.3 MB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 2.3 MB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 148.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Birmingham.io needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 148.1 kB or 79% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (20%)
54
43
The browser has sent 54 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Birmingham. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
birmingham.io
173 ms
talk.birmingham.io
588 ms
desktop_f1cc59cdb29bc4657b5fc755a19fbaf9f2ef3824.css
188 ms
7e202ef2-56d7-47d5-98d8-a9c8d15e57dd.css
272 ms
preload_store-d16a3675434b5a0043157cfc2b850471.js
259 ms
en-0d052f1778205ded3a5313bab3eb474e.js
370 ms
ember_jquery-37c15254b70c40ceb7888cb7248c79d6.js
685 ms
vendor-452f97af88148c7c4701976c024dd679.js
593 ms
application-181695bf18f2e0956cef4d683e659113.js
800 ms
browser-update-1b088c371e098d02d2b87570660d5d68.js
340 ms
analytics.js
326 ms
eccc0c10e66cbdd32d0f1f2b4547f56552e7cd50.png
324 ms
2_1.png
93 ms
13_1.png
121 ms
938_1.png
131 ms
282_1.png
128 ms
432_1.png
111 ms
868_1.png
113 ms
790_1.png
197 ms
281_1.png
205 ms
confused.png
194 ms
523_1.png
227 ms
479_1.png
237 ms
429_1.png
239 ms
25.png
290 ms
58_1.png
299 ms
277_1.png
301 ms
264_1.png
336 ms
250_1.png
334 ms
930_1.png
351 ms
153_1.png
374 ms
57_1.png
406 ms
46_1.png
400 ms
71_1.png
444 ms
9_1.png
446 ms
723_1.png
458 ms
608_1.png
467 ms
454_1.png
494 ms
498_1.png
506 ms
180_1.png
556 ms
215_1.png
562 ms
174_1.png
568 ms
82_1.png
563 ms
137_1.png
590 ms
604_1.png
611 ms
926_1.png
669 ms
67_1.png
680 ms
fontawesome-webfont-90e687312466f7a4993c85399c116f2f.woff
897 ms
collect
12 ms
831_1.png
591 ms
25.png
580 ms
65_1.png
607 ms
918_1.png
672 ms
607_1.png
670 ms
908_1.png
669 ms
902_1.png
608 ms
grippie-d28a6f65e22c0033dcf0d63883bcc590.png
614 ms
birmingham.io accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
birmingham.io best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
birmingham.io SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Birmingham.io can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Birmingham.io main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
birmingham.io
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Birmingham. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: