3.6 sec in total
620 ms
2.7 sec
243 ms
Visit bodyproject.us now to see the best up-to-date Body Project content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about bodyproject.us
Providing experienced Alexander Technique lessons and classes in San Francisco and Berkeley. Find out more about Alexander Technique with Elyse Shafarman.
Visit bodyproject.usWe analyzed Bodyproject.us page load time and found that the first response time was 620 ms and then it took 3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
bodyproject.us performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value10.4 s
0/100
10%
Value11.4 s
0/100
25%
Value17.9 s
0/100
10%
Value26,320 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.026
100/100
15%
Value49.2 s
0/100
10%
620 ms
81 ms
144 ms
1092 ms
131 ms
Our browser made a total of 76 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 83% of them (63 requests) were addressed to the original Bodyproject.us, 4% (3 requests) were made to S7.addthis.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to S.ytimg.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Bodyproject.us.
Page size can be reduced by 1.1 MB (54%)
2.1 MB
980.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Bodyproject.us main page is 2.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 1.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 52.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 52.2 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 5.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Body Project images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 683.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 683.0 kB or 67% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 399.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Bodyproject.us needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 399.4 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 46 (65%)
71
25
The browser has sent 71 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Body Project. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 30 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 18 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
bodyproject.us
620 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
81 ms
flick.css
144 ms
1092 ms
style.css
131 ms
layout.css
81 ms
purple.css
150 ms
responsive.css
112 ms
style.php
1242 ms
formalize.css
146 ms
superfish.css
156 ms
prettyPhoto.css
179 ms
nonverblaster.css
177 ms
flexslider.css
174 ms
css
26 ms
settings.css
217 ms
captions.css
210 ms
tinymce.css
218 ms
jquery.js
283 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
244 ms
scrollTo.js
234 ms
jquery.form.min.js
261 ms
mailchimp.js
266 ms
core.min.js
287 ms
datepicker.js
315 ms
swfobject.js
305 ms
jquery.themepunch.plugins.min.js
312 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
349 ms
addthis_widget.js
9 ms
superfish.js
301 ms
jquery.jcarousellite.js
302 ms
like.js.php
1089 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.js
334 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
329 ms
jquery.isotope.min.js
346 ms
jquery.formalize.min.js
349 ms
nonverblaster.js
361 ms
dynamic.js.php
1365 ms
app.js
353 ms
jquery.flexslider.min.js
369 ms
ssba.min.js
365 ms
style.css
361 ms
bodyproject.us
795 ms
to-top.png
121 ms
bp_logowo.png
26 ms
s2.jpg
123 ms
s5.jpg
122 ms
s41.jpg
120 ms
s7.jpg
125 ms
s6.jpg
127 ms
s3.jpg
123 ms
yelp_icon75.png
126 ms
facebook.png
122 ms
linkedin.png
122 ms
pinterest.png
124 ms
twitter_alt.png
126 ms
excerpt-icon.png
895 ms
divider1.png
674 ms
300lo.json
112 ms
menu.c646c958f7e380f4e000.js
23 ms
sh.8e5f85691f9aaa082472a194.html
123 ms
timer.png
57 ms
loader.gif
60 ms
shadow2.png
61 ms
small_left.png
58 ms
small_right.png
63 ms
large_left.png
66 ms
large_right.png
71 ms
abErJ5gFIe0
49 ms
www-embed-player-vflfNyN_r.css
22 ms
www-embed-player.js
46 ms
base.js
68 ms
fBnyGA8Aionz5086-mElmoOSPUuyQ1M9Un647_EjucU.js
35 ms
ad_status.js
38 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
81 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
95 ms
bodyproject.us accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
button, link, and menuitem elements do not have accessible names.
[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
bodyproject.us best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
bodyproject.us SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Bodyproject.us can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Bodyproject.us main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
bodyproject.us
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Body Project. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: