21.8 sec in total
383 ms
21.1 sec
326 ms
Visit boutiquebedding.com now to see the best up-to-date Boutiquebedding content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about boutiquebedding.com
Buy a domain and see how a premium domain can be the best investment. Your business starts here. Buy a domain today.
Visit boutiquebedding.comWe analyzed Boutiquebedding.com page load time and found that the first response time was 383 ms and then it took 21.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster.
boutiquebedding.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value7.9 s
0/100
10%
Value9.1 s
1/100
25%
Value8.4 s
18/100
10%
Value2,850 ms
3/100
30%
Value0.191
64/100
15%
Value20.2 s
2/100
10%
383 ms
658 ms
868 ms
183 ms
390 ms
Our browser made a total of 99 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Boutiquebedding.com, 7% (7 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 6% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2 sec) relates to the external source E.monetate.net.
Page size can be reduced by 640.7 kB (67%)
959.6 kB
318.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Boutiquebedding.com main page is 959.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 725.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 37.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 37.5 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Boutiquebedding needs image optimization as it can save up to 3.5 kB or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 473.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 473.9 kB or 65% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 125.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Boutiquebedding.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 125.9 kB or 81% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 66 (73%)
90
24
The browser has sent 90 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Boutiquebedding. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 51 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
boutiquebedding.com
383 ms
monetate.js
658 ms
application.css
868 ms
ng-modal.css
183 ms
angular.min.js
390 ms
ng-modal.js
176 ms
google_analytics.js
177 ms
google_oauth.js
176 ms
bold_chat.js
229 ms
eloqua.js
232 ms
hotjar.js
230 ms
adroll.js
242 ms
impactRadius.js
299 ms
in.js
305 ms
api.js
320 ms
api:client.js
306 ms
app.js
300 ms
cookies.js
299 ms
socialMedia.js
311 ms
countryDropdown.js
347 ms
monetate.js
355 ms
index.js
347 ms
lander.js
362 ms
seoPages.js
390 ms
sitePages.js
394 ms
search.js
405 ms
modal.js
426 ms
forms.js
424 ms
tldSelector.js
428 ms
setFixedTop.js
429 ms
searchBar.js
441 ms
currency.js
464 ms
trust.js
464 ms
conversion.js
162 ms
tdfs-inner.css
467 ms
tdfs-temp.css
467 ms
thankyou.css
479 ms
entry.js
2017 ms
custom.js
198 ms
css
333 ms
fontawesome.min.css
195 ms
bd-icons.min.css
63 ms
analytics.js
269 ms
foundation-A136666-2811-40ba-bff2-3df3af8bc2ae1.min.js
268 ms
userspace
1404 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
370 ms
recaptcha__en.js
517 ms
all.js
520 ms
508 ms
logo-header-2x.png
238 ms
831523275-0
237 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
405 ms
1157 ms
hotjar-10205.js
465 ms
elqCfg.min.js
156 ms
bg-main-hilight-fade.jpg
121 ms
bg-select.png
120 ms
bg-target-bd-icon.png
113 ms
linkid.js
178 ms
ecommerce.js
180 ms
foundation-tags-SD780-3f5b-4f28-957f-6e6dc25a7fc41.min.js
712 ms
831523275-1
157 ms
svrGP
1452 ms
postmessageRelay
405 ms
165 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTXhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
179 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3T8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
242 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSnhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
392 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzHhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
390 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
209 ms
anchor
135 ms
collect
107 ms
collect
626 ms
collect
91 ms
collect
90 ms
collect
152 ms
iframe
498 ms
440 ms
modules-79ac3e471402dedc7fa595a0b4974f10.js
1392 ms
styles__ltr.css
806 ms
xd_arbiter.php
1947 ms
xd_arbiter.php
778 ms
1077434459-postmessagerelay.js
324 ms
rpc:shindig_random.js
341 ms
2172305219-idpiframe.js
91 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
43 ms
iframerpc
72 ms
framework
125 ms
logo_48.png
61 ms
pmjEM-GhLlUNyebIUFzIQS75e2Oo2a-wD-zEAXBpQqk.js
99 ms
webworker.js
1040 ms
2UX7WLTfW3W8TclTUvlFyQ.woff
1269 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUT8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
1337 ms
recaptcha__en.js
100 ms
vms.js
204 ms
roundtrip.js
116 ms
xd_arbiter.php
664 ms
bc.pv
155 ms
542IK7HHBBFJJFENPFA7WX.js
567 ms
boutiquebedding.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA IDs are not unique
boutiquebedding.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
boutiquebedding.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Page is blocked from indexing
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Boutiquebedding.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Boutiquebedding.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
boutiquebedding.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Boutiquebedding. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: