1.5 sec in total
92 ms
1 sec
373 ms
Click here to check amazing Buffer content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about buffer.com
Use Buffer to manage your social media so that you have more time for your business. Join 160,000+ small businesses today.
Visit buffer.comWe analyzed Buffer.com page load time and found that the first response time was 92 ms and then it took 1.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.
buffer.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.4 s
70/100
10%
Value5.4 s
20/100
25%
Value2.8 s
95/100
10%
Value650 ms
46/100
30%
Value0.096
91/100
15%
Value9.9 s
27/100
10%
92 ms
93 ms
110 ms
98 ms
82 ms
Our browser made a total of 63 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 11% of them (7 requests) were addressed to the original Buffer.com, 32% (20 requests) were made to D389zggrogs7qo.cloudfront.net and 10% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (437 ms) relates to the external source Fonts.gstatic.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.5 MB (52%)
2.9 MB
1.4 MB
In fact, the total size of Buffer.com main page is 2.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 66.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 66.3 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 171.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Buffer needs image optimization as it can save up to 171.0 kB or 18% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 862.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 862.3 kB or 66% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 413.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Buffer.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 413.9 kB or 72% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 24 (44%)
55
31
The browser has sent 55 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Buffer. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
buffer.com
92 ms
css
93 ms
css
110 ms
homepage.af11beb8d2897cdba7007a47c7a4c5bc.gz.css
98 ms
webfonts_bundle.0c901bab6211068beeeedc32e2ba57a9.gz.css
82 ms
jquery.min.js
134 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
148 ms
base.min.a785033f1d469fbce94f3e5cb5f5d4fa.js
91 ms
oct.js
192 ms
homepage_bundle.0bf94560864fe66adf39d8a108cb6ac1.gz.js
132 ms
jsapi
95 ms
api.js
131 ms
addthis_widget.js
90 ms
buffermetrics.min.5cf5e1d04e5f254e2c93148a60999518.js
84 ms
bugsnag-2.min.js
79 ms
css
25 ms
adsct
311 ms
adsct
309 ms
fbds.js
80 ms
analytics.js
291 ms
buffer-logo@2x.png
28 ms
img-buffer-illustration-hub-960@2x.png
233 ms
img-buffer-illustration-hub-320@2x.png
246 ms
ic_buffer.svg
231 ms
ic_android.svg
252 ms
ic_apple.svg
252 ms
ic_arrow_right_grey.svg
197 ms
ic_arrow_right.svg
195 ms
product-screenshot-queue.png
232 ms
product-screenshot-composer.png
244 ms
img_buffer_discover.png
252 ms
img_buffer_pablo.png
368 ms
img_buffer_pablo_image.png
361 ms
icon-twitter.svg
252 ms
icon-facebook.svg
266 ms
icon-linkedin.svg
264 ms
icon-google-plus.svg
318 ms
icon-pinterest.svg
316 ms
buffer-logo.png
337 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3T8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
360 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTXhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
384 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSnhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
435 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzHhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
437 ms
282 ms
ss-social-regular.woff
302 ms
recaptcha__en.js
366 ms
api.html
171 ms
aquant.js
250 ms
129 ms
300lo.json
174 ms
d9G.js
216 ms
sh.7c7179124ea24ac6ba46caac.html
110 ms
collect
58 ms
pixel;r=1400893578;a=p-rw_1uEX-gMkjA;orderid=;revenue=;labels=_fp.event.Homepage;fpan=1;fpa=P0-1604056363-1456803266100;ns=0;ce=1;cm=;je=0;sr=1024x768x32;enc=n;dst=0;et=1456803266099;tzo=-180;ref=;url=https%3A%2F%2Fbuffer.com%2F;ogl=title.Buffer%20-%20A%20Smarter%20Way%20to%20Share%20on%20Social%20Media%2Cimage.http%3A%2F%2Fstatic%252Ebufferapp%252Ecom%2Fimages%2Ffacebook%2Fbuffer-logo-facebook-preview%252Epng%2Cdescription.Buffer%20makes%20it%20super%20easy%20to%20share%20any%20page%20you're%20reading%252E%20Keep%20your%20Buffer%20to
78 ms
anchor
43 ms
styles__ltr.css
23 ms
3S-QlPMSNPmZHIC0k0XLHhyc4Z2xiLseOE2qhpfcAp0.js
9 ms
webworker.js
54 ms
logo_48.png
30 ms
2UX7WLTfW3W8TclTUvlFyQ.woff
30 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUT8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
31 ms
nr-852.min.js
52 ms
recaptcha__en.js
18 ms
buffer.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
buffer.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
buffer.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Buffer.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Buffer.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
buffer.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Buffer. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: