Report Summary

  • 71

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    82% of other websites

  • 93

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 82% of websites

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    95% of websites

bumblebee.in

** Personalized Emails and URLs **

Page Load Speed

976 ms in total

First Response

182 ms

Resources Loaded

697 ms

Page Rendered

97 ms

bumblebee.in screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Bumblebee content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about bumblebee.in

Personalized Emails and URLs

Visit bumblebee.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Bumblebee.in page load time and found that the first response time was 182 ms and then it took 794 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

bumblebee.in performance score

71

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.0 s

51/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.6 s

17/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.0 s

94/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value50 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.093

91/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.5 s

82/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

bumblebee.in

182 ms

jquery.min.js

28 ms

bh.php

65 ms

cf.php

103 ms

adframe.js

73 ms

Our browser made a total of 23 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 70% of them (16 requests) were addressed to the original Bumblebee.in, 9% (2 requests) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com and 9% (2 requests) were made to Dp.g.doubleclick.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (182 ms) belongs to the original domain Bumblebee.in.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 983 B (1%)

Content Size

88.8 kB

After Optimization

87.8 kB

In fact, the total size of Bumblebee.in main page is 88.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 86.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-45%

Potential reduce by 740 B

  • Original 1.6 kB
  • After minification 1.6 kB
  • After compression 890 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 740 B or 45% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-12%

Potential reduce by 105 B

  • Original 896 B
  • After minification 791 B

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Bumblebee needs image optimization as it can save up to 105 B or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 138 B

  • Original 86.3 kB
  • After minification 86.3 kB
  • After compression 86.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (14%)

Requests Now

22

After Optimization

19

The browser has sent 22 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Bumblebee. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

bumblebee.in accessibility score

93

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

SEO Factors

bumblebee.in SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Bumblebee.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Bumblebee.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Bumblebee. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: