3.5 sec in total
478 ms
2.9 sec
149 ms
Click here to check amazing Shorelight Blue Jeans content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about shorelight.bluejeans.com
Visit shorelight.bluejeans.comWe analyzed Shorelight.bluejeans.com page load time and found that the first response time was 478 ms and then it took 3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
shorelight.bluejeans.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.5 s
66/100
10%
Value2.7 s
84/100
25%
Value5.5 s
54/100
10%
Value790 ms
37/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value12.5 s
14/100
10%
478 ms
80 ms
166 ms
229 ms
381 ms
Our browser made a total of 47 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 77% of them (36 requests) were addressed to the original Shorelight.bluejeans.com, 15% (7 requests) were made to Static.bluejeans.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Bam.nr-data.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Shorelight.bluejeans.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.1 MB (77%)
1.4 MB
326.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Shorelight.bluejeans.com main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 12.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 12.2 kB or 64% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Shorelight Blue Jeans needs image optimization as it can save up to 3.2 kB or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 1.0 MB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.0 MB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 87.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Shorelight.bluejeans.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 87.9 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 31 (72%)
43
12
The browser has sent 43 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Shorelight Blue Jeans. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
shorelight.bluejeans.com
478 ms
CLP.css
80 ms
jquery.min.js
166 ms
jquery.cookies.min.js
229 ms
mainCss.css
381 ms
jqueryui.css
232 ms
jqueryui.min.js
409 ms
HeaderNavigationBkgd.png
81 ms
bluejeans-logo.png
92 ms
imageFile1.png
147 ms
163 ms
136 ms
1328 ms
ui-bg_flat_100_ffffff_40x100.png
78 ms
ui-icons_666666_256x240.png
153 ms
reset.css
83 ms
common.css
97 ms
attendCssFile.css
104 ms
URI.min.js
143 ms
171 ms
common.js
163 ms
lodash.js
182 ms
en.json.js
12 ms
loader.js
217 ms
dialogs_iframe.js
227 ms
reset.css
220 ms
jqueryui.css
226 ms
common.css
237 ms
loginCssFile.css
131 ms
jquery.min.js
272 ms
jquery.cookies.min.js
279 ms
jqueryui.min.js
388 ms
URI.min.js
314 ms
common.js
315 ms
input-bg.png
257 ms
ProximaNova-Bold-webfont.woff
337 ms
input-bg.png
146 ms
ProximaNova-Bold-webfont.woff
156 ms
nr-885.min.js
51 ms
6c5e7da778
111 ms
6c5e7da778
111 ms
signupCssFile.css
88 ms
100 ms
BJN_ga-track.js
83 ms
simplified_signup.js
81 ms
signup.css
320 ms
ga.js
27 ms
shorelight.bluejeans.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
shorelight.bluejeans.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
shorelight.bluejeans.com SEO score
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Shorelight.bluejeans.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Shorelight.bluejeans.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
shorelight.bluejeans.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Shorelight Blue Jeans. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: