Tools & Wizards About Us
annualreview.cushwake.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

annualreview.cushwake.com

Default Web Site Page

Page Load Speed

933 ms in total

First Response

128 ms

Resources Loaded

633 ms

Page Rendered

172 ms

annualreview.cushwake.com screenshot

About Website

Visit annualreview.cushwake.com now to see the best up-to-date Annualreview Cushwake content for Singapore and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about annualreview.cushwake.com

Visit annualreview.cushwake.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Annualreview.cushwake.com page load time and found that the first response time was 128 ms and then it took 805 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

annualreview.cushwake.com performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

annualreview.cushwake.com

128 ms

default_2015.css

111 ms

orbit-1.2.3.css

102 ms

jquery.mCustomScrollbar.css

112 ms

lush.min.css

126 ms

Our browser made a total of 53 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 75% of them (40 requests) were addressed to the original Annualreview.cushwake.com, 8% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 6% (3 requests) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (268 ms) belongs to the original domain Annualreview.cushwake.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 643.0 kB (29%)

Content Size

2.2 MB

After Optimization

1.5 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Annualreview.cushwake.com main page is 2.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-72%

Potential reduce by 45.7 kB

  • Original 63.6 kB
  • After minification 60.6 kB
  • After compression 17.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 45.7 kB or 72% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 39.2 kB

  • Original 1.4 MB
  • After minification 1.3 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Annualreview Cushwake images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-69%

Potential reduce by 408.0 kB

  • Original 591.2 kB
  • After minification 523.4 kB
  • After compression 183.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 408.0 kB or 69% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-89%

Potential reduce by 150.2 kB

  • Original 169.4 kB
  • After minification 138.5 kB
  • After compression 19.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Annualreview.cushwake.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 150.2 kB or 89% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 22 (47%)

Requests Now

47

After Optimization

25

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 47 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Annualreview Cushwake. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

annualreview.cushwake.com

annualreview.cushwake.com

128 ms

default_2015.css

default_2015.css

111 ms

orbit-1.2.3.css

orbit-1.2.3.css

102 ms

jquery.mCustomScrollbar.css

jquery.mCustomScrollbar.css

112 ms

lush.min.css

lush.min.css

126 ms

lush.animations.css

lush.animations.css

133 ms

default_2013.js

default_2013.js

87 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

32 ms

jquery.mCustomScrollbar.concat.min.js

jquery.mCustomScrollbar.concat.min.js

131 ms

jquery.easing.1.3.min.js

jquery.easing.1.3.min.js

129 ms

jquery.lush.js

jquery.lush.js

174 ms

dropdown.js

dropdown.js

156 ms

news.css

news.css

155 ms

swfobject.js

swfobject.js

65 ms

spinners.js

spinners.js

184 ms

lightview.js

lightview.js

195 ms

lightview.css

lightview.css

168 ms

jquery.hoverizr.min.js

jquery.hoverizr.min.js

166 ms

jquery-ui-1.8.16.custom.css

jquery-ui-1.8.16.custom.css

194 ms

jquery.ui.touch-punch.min.js

jquery.ui.touch-punch.min.js

194 ms

jquery-ui.min.js

jquery-ui.min.js

48 ms

jgestures.js

jgestures.js

248 ms

addthis_widget.js

addthis_widget.js

87 ms

css

css

27 ms

9QCBVh5lYUzIUw5Y0GO2jqCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

9QCBVh5lYUzIUw5Y0GO2jqCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

34 ms

187TYb8ysVvxar86IcDsZ3YhjbSpvc47ee6xR_80Hnw.ttf

187TYb8ysVvxar86IcDsZ3YhjbSpvc47ee6xR_80Hnw.ttf

88 ms

TNtGAwzXtCEY_5hzRlIJNHYhjbSpvc47ee6xR_80Hnw.ttf

TNtGAwzXtCEY_5hzRlIJNHYhjbSpvc47ee6xR_80Hnw.ttf

88 ms

nHiQo1BypvYzt95zlPq1TnYhjbSpvc47ee6xR_80Hnw.ttf

nHiQo1BypvYzt95zlPq1TnYhjbSpvc47ee6xR_80Hnw.ttf

87 ms

cw-logo.png

cw-logo.png

82 ms

ico-home.png

ico-home.png

81 ms

home-bg.jpg

home-bg.jpg

165 ms

home-headline-1.png

home-headline-1.png

164 ms

home-bg2.jpg

home-bg2.jpg

170 ms

home-headline-2.png

home-headline-2.png

164 ms

home-bg3.jpg

home-bg3.jpg

167 ms

home-headline-3.png

home-headline-3.png

164 ms

home-bg4.jpg

home-bg4.jpg

268 ms

home-headline-4.png

home-headline-4.png

169 ms

home-bg5.jpg

home-bg5.jpg

214 ms

home-headline-5.png

home-headline-5.png

212 ms

home-bg6.jpg

home-bg6.jpg

218 ms

home-headline-6.png

home-headline-6.png

215 ms

banner-no-repeat-red.png

banner-no-repeat-red.png

215 ms

book-icon.gif

book-icon.gif

216 ms

facebook.gif

facebook.gif

226 ms

twitter.gif

twitter.gif

217 ms

linkedin.gif

linkedin.gif

226 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

72 ms

300lo.json

300lo.json

66 ms

sprite.png

sprite.png

69 ms

blank.gif

blank.gif

71 ms

sh.7c7179124ea24ac6ba46caac.html

sh.7c7179124ea24ac6ba46caac.html

72 ms

collect

collect

20 ms

SEO Factors

annualreview.cushwake.com SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Annualreview.cushwake.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Annualreview.cushwake.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

annualreview.cushwake.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Annualreview Cushwake. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: