12.7 sec in total
5.5 sec
6.7 sec
568 ms
Click here to check amazing Call Analytics Reviews content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about callanalyticsreviews.com
Call Analytics Reviews finds the best companies and platforms for uncovering insights about your inbound phone calls.
Visit callanalyticsreviews.comWe analyzed Callanalyticsreviews.com page load time and found that the first response time was 5.5 sec and then it took 7.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
callanalyticsreviews.com performance score
5491 ms
37 ms
160 ms
44 ms
156 ms
Our browser made a total of 61 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 72% of them (44 requests) were addressed to the original Callanalyticsreviews.com, 21% (13 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (5.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Callanalyticsreviews.com.
Page size can be reduced by 658.4 kB (53%)
1.2 MB
574.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Callanalyticsreviews.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 407.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 28.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 28.3 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 11.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Call Analytics Reviews images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 285.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 285.5 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 332.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Callanalyticsreviews.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 332.9 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 33 (73%)
45
12
The browser has sent 45 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Call Analytics Reviews. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
callanalyticsreviews.com
5491 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
37 ms
css
160 ms
style.min.css
44 ms
jquery-ui.css
156 ms
form.min.css
127 ms
bootstrap.min.css
143 ms
bootstrap-theme.min.css
130 ms
font-awesome.min.css
131 ms
swiper.min.css
128 ms
magnific-popup.css
109 ms
loaders.min.css
138 ms
style.css
140 ms
katharine.css
199 ms
jquery.min.js
207 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
193 ms
core.min.js
191 ms
datepicker.min.js
196 ms
underscore.min.js
191 ms
form.min.js
211 ms
loaders.css.js
209 ms
api.js
191 ms
backbone.min.js
208 ms
wp-api.js
207 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
217 ms
mediaelement-migrate.min.js
208 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.js
208 ms
bootstrap.min.js
215 ms
swiper.min.js
217 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.min.js
209 ms
jquery.waypoints.min.js
209 ms
isotope.pkgd.min.js
215 ms
scripts.js
217 ms
wp-embed.min.js
217 ms
style.css
92 ms
callanalyticsreviews.png
67 ms
clock.svg
67 ms
Image-Call-Analytics-Reviews.png
69 ms
heart.svg
68 ms
comment.svg
70 ms
PayPerCallNetworks.com-Call-Analytics-Reviews.jpg
71 ms
The-Ultimate-List-of-Call-Analytics-Platforms.jpg
72 ms
What-is-Call-Analytics-Blog.jpg
73 ms
Call-Analytics-Software-Reviews.jpg
72 ms
Ringba-Banner.jpg
73 ms
u-4l0qyriQwlOrhSvowK_l5-eR7lXff4jvk.ttf
151 ms
u-4m0qyriQwlOrhSvowK_l5-eRZOf-c.ttf
205 ms
u-4l0qyriQwlOrhSvowK_l5-eR71Wvf4jvk.ttf
205 ms
u-4l0qyriQwlOrhSvowK_l5-eR7NWPf4jvk.ttf
203 ms
u-4n0qyriQwlOrhSvowK_l521wRZWMf_.ttf
197 ms
u-440qyriQwlOrhSvowK_l5-fCZJ.ttf
195 ms
u-4n0qyriQwlOrhSvowK_l52xwNZWMf_.ttf
195 ms
u-4n0qyriQwlOrhSvowK_l52_wFZWMf_.ttf
289 ms
Montserrat-Light.otf
88 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf
293 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX8.ttf
294 ms
ieVl2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-19K7CA.ttf
292 ms
ieVi2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-33mZGCQYag.ttf
288 ms
ieVi2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-32meGCQYag.ttf
288 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
93 ms
recaptcha__en.js
289 ms
callanalyticsreviews.com SEO score
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Callanalyticsreviews.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Callanalyticsreviews.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
callanalyticsreviews.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Call Analytics Reviews. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: