2.9 sec in total
471 ms
2.3 sec
169 ms
Click here to check amazing Center content for Norway. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about center.no
Vi selger kun produkter fordi de er av høy kvalitet. Vi er totalt avhengige av fornøyde kunder for å drive Center.no
Visit center.noWe analyzed Center.no page load time and found that the first response time was 471 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
center.no performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.4 s
7/100
10%
Value11.5 s
0/100
25%
Value9.6 s
11/100
10%
Value2,250 ms
6/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value18.4 s
3/100
10%
471 ms
518 ms
483 ms
337 ms
559 ms
Our browser made a total of 41 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 63% of them (26 requests) were addressed to the original Center.no, 10% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (781 ms) belongs to the original domain Center.no.
Page size can be reduced by 1.5 MB (79%)
1.9 MB
388.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Center.no main page is 1.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 24.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 4.3 kB, which is 13% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 24.1 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 8.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Center needs image optimization as it can save up to 8.1 kB or 15% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 342.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 342.8 kB or 66% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.1 MB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Center.no needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.1 MB or 88% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 19 (59%)
32
13
The browser has sent 32 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Center. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
center.no
471 ms
center.no
518 ms
fY9hDsIwCIUv1A6XaDwP61AbS2kKzfT21i0xmpj9A973HjBCkGwYzF-ksj9DzCG1mRSCKqg9E6kbYREJwkw1UAdTksW34okxJgUjLgmtezapFXUnmFFvsYfrwDG7I1jv7pM8PoU7ANMcMVA2qoCqZNvaScTUKpbV-outJ_2Zf9mvlWhHliUNAas0pbQfhDly_-sNvQA.css
483 ms
M9DPTU3JTExOzStJLdJPLC5OLSnWTy4u1k_LzyvRTSxPLc7PTdXLzcwDAA.css
337 ms
M9TPKo5Pzs8tyC9OLdJPLC5OLSnWTy4uRhYGAA.css
559 ms
css
71 ms
M9bPKixNLarUMYYydHMz04sSS1L1cjPzAA.js
645 ms
BcGBCcAwCATAiUQ6khUDKZoPUcn6vXv4AooIO2o04I5LvclCpieXxXYpS_6SRxuJKnoVZb-pZ-6aWPkD.js
340 ms
TcxBDoAwCETRC1lJT2RIi4kmMAaIXt8uWc9_0-kDBlTFhxBHSAbdQafDUmwSz9kSbbDnrpdtfa3HAg9CvIB3xfCod63YHw.js
341 ms
conversion.js
42 ms
M9RPzs8rSUwu0U3LL8rVNdfPzEvOKU1JLdbPAqLC0tSiSj2QjF5uZh4A.js
440 ms
LcnBDYAgDADAhYSGlzM4gANgrQlIqbYQ4_YmxOflAqDUFrG5Q5TdDKli6TsZZANDTVezKcAjgsJMigTRjNr4fHfS121F8Ozppx9cF8-pfg.js
449 ms
M9Qvz89Pzs_NTS1KTtVPLC5OLSnWzyrWTyvKzytJzUtBltbLzczTMcShIauwNLWoUjc5Pz87MxXK04PwQPoA.js
447 ms
BcEBCoBACATAF9XSk8T2okAFV7jvN3NhV3lFsJ0wiSN8wurKYd5w6zlW2xPM0Rlv_g.js
637 ms
all.js
62 ms
jc5LDsIwEAPQC9EEBAdB4gBVPhZJaTNhZkrp7fksWIbuvHi2fLKacrh5ev7Cbm8nxOwCioKtE4GKHcR6IhVlV82Uy3_VJXqAu8hUIy2lWaJlNMExzYKxCRESNUEQ6T3TIuD-PYagxM3CcJ_Bq4GTXK7dwRy36MpQXc-JlLbwMIvSdPneaXpdK1yCi8bPJY744Bc.js
781 ms
M9DPTU3JTExOzStJLdJPLC5OLSnWzyrWz0jMS8lJTUosKtbLzcwDAA.js
695 ms
M9DPTU3JTExOzStJLdJPLC5OLSnWzyrWL88v18vNzNMxwCGfVViaWlSpl1WQk1iZWgRSCgA.js
668 ms
M9DPTU3JTExOzStJLdJPLC5OLSnWzyrWL04uyiwoKdbLzczTMdEvL9BNzU1KTQFxAQ.js
691 ms
js_composer_front.js
692 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
126 ms
analytics.js
79 ms
96 ms
40506_Center_logo_011.png
270 ms
Center-Software-Logo-300x93.png
271 ms
GPS_Sporing_Logo-300x71.png
271 ms
Mikroskop_logo.png-300x109.png
271 ms
Viltkameralogo2.png
287 ms
61234_Optikk_logo_01-3.png
288 ms
fbevents.js
322 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3T8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
207 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSnhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
225 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzHhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
244 ms
EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-hnhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
253 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
537 ms
collect
10 ms
collect
230 ms
215 ms
loadingAnimation.gif
141 ms
ga-audiences
18 ms
26 ms
center.no accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
center.no best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
center.no SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
NO
NB
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Center.no can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Norwegian is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed language. Our system also found out that Center.no main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
center.no
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Center. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: