19.2 sec in total
6.4 sec
12.5 sec
240 ms
Click here to check amazing Charternet content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about charternet.com
A full-service website design and online marketing firm with industry-specific expertise for fishing charters, yacht brokers, charter brokers, marinas, & more.
Visit charternet.comWe analyzed Charternet.com page load time and found that the first response time was 6.4 sec and then it took 12.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
charternet.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.1 s
20/100
10%
Value12.7 s
0/100
25%
Value11.8 s
4/100
10%
Value2,980 ms
3/100
30%
Value0.009
100/100
15%
Value19.3 s
2/100
10%
6368 ms
42 ms
66 ms
65 ms
70 ms
Our browser made a total of 78 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 62% of them (48 requests) were addressed to the original Charternet.com, 9% (7 requests) were made to Maps.googleapis.com and 5% (4 requests) were made to S3.amazonaws.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (6.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Charternet.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.8 MB (67%)
2.6 MB
856.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Charternet.com main page is 2.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 36.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 36.6 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Charternet images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 694.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 694.9 kB or 66% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.0 MB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Charternet.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.0 MB or 87% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 60 (81%)
74
14
The browser has sent 74 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Charternet. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 45 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 17 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.charternet.com
6368 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
42 ms
crp-main-front.css
66 ms
crp-tc-buttons.css
65 ms
font-awesome.css
70 ms
woocommerce-layout.css
67 ms
dashicons.min.css
92 ms
packages.css
69 ms
css
39 ms
style.min.css
154 ms
js_composer.min.css
170 ms
style.css
88 ms
jetpack.css
99 ms
js
67 ms
jquery.js
146 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
112 ms
crp-main-front.js
111 ms
crp-helper.js
123 ms
crp-social.js
137 ms
jquery.nanobar.js
136 ms
add-to-cart.min.js
148 ms
woocommerce-add-to-cart.js
165 ms
wp-job-manager-reviews.js
233 ms
site.js
39 ms
api.js
52 ms
core.min.js
258 ms
widget.min.js
259 ms
mouse.min.js
259 ms
slider.min.js
259 ms
underscore.min.js
260 ms
backbone.min.js
260 ms
wp-util.min.js
260 ms
wp-backbone.min.js
260 ms
jquery.deserialize.js
260 ms
chosen.jquery.min.js
261 ms
ajax-filters.min.js
260 ms
app.min.js
263 ms
app.min.js
262 ms
jquery.blockUI.min.js
261 ms
woocommerce.min.js
260 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
31 ms
gprofiles.js
85 ms
e-201611.js
31 ms
jquery.cookie.min.js
260 ms
cart-fragments.min.js
237 ms
wpgroho.js
249 ms
salvattore.min.js
211 ms
wp-embed.min.js
209 ms
ga.js
74 ms
cropped-CNET-Logo-WHITE3.png
63 ms
Slide-7-1600x600.jpg
238 ms
deep-sea-fishing-full.jpg
247 ms
CNET-Logo-Header-MailChimp.png
63 ms
widgets.css
23 ms
settings
54 ms
ionicons.ttf
215 ms
scrollbox.js
186 ms
recaptcha__en.js
200 ms
__utm.gif
138 ms
common.js
88 ms
util.js
106 ms
geocoder.js
88 ms
iw_close.gif
163 ms
overlay.js
77 ms
controls.js
87 ms
places_impl.js
87 ms
www.charternet.com
2961 ms
hovercard.css
77 ms
services.css
114 ms
collect
108 ms
g.gif
11 ms
232556
31 ms
main.css
50 ms
powered-by-google-on-white3.png
42 ms
autocomplete-icons.png
56 ms
css
65 ms
513 ms
woocommerce-smallscreen.css
26 ms
charternet.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
charternet.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
charternet.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Charternet.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Charternet.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
charternet.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Charternet. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: