10.4 sec in total
354 ms
9.6 sec
448 ms
Visit chatter.digital now to see the best up-to-date Chatter content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about chatter.digital
Let us take care of your social media content needs. Social media packages from $99. #1 Social Media Content Creation Agency. No contracts. Cancel anytime.
Visit chatter.digitalWe analyzed Chatter.digital page load time and found that the first response time was 354 ms and then it took 10 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
chatter.digital performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.3 s
39/100
10%
Value6.9 s
6/100
25%
Value5.9 s
48/100
10%
Value1,490 ms
14/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value12.5 s
14/100
10%
354 ms
23 ms
165 ms
189 ms
242 ms
Our browser made a total of 84 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 92% of them (77 requests) were addressed to the original Chatter.digital, 4% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (5.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Chatter.digital.
Page size can be reduced by 368.8 kB (55%)
666.8 kB
298.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Chatter.digital main page is 666.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 435.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 355.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 355.6 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 13.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Chatter images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 44 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 53 (73%)
73
20
The browser has sent 73 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Chatter. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 54 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
chatter.digital
354 ms
css
23 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
165 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
189 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
242 ms
hooks.min.js
218 ms
w.js
19 ms
jquery.min.js
239 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
183 ms
jquery.blockUI.min.js
326 ms
add-to-cart.min.js
335 ms
js.cookie.min.js
346 ms
woocommerce.min.js
369 ms
cart-fragments.min.js
400 ms
jquery.min.js
476 ms
email-decode.min.js
327 ms
jquery.selectBox.min.js
595 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.min.js
596 ms
jquery.yith-wcwl.min.js
597 ms
wpa.js
597 ms
sourcebuster.min.js
598 ms
order-attribution.min.js
599 ms
woocompare.min.js
658 ms
jquery.colorbox-min.js
675 ms
general.min.js
663 ms
eael-128.js
712 ms
isotope.pkgd.min.js
752 ms
popper.js
771 ms
bootstrap.min.js
852 ms
select2.full.min.js
827 ms
jquery.navpoints.js
829 ms
jquery.countdown.min.js
832 ms
jquery.nivo.slider.min.js
835 ms
theia-sticky-sidebar.min.js
933 ms
jquery.timepicker.min.js
1045 ms
tilt.jquery.js
991 ms
jquery.parallax-scroll.js
995 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.min.js
1094 ms
v84a3a4012de94ce1a686ba8c167c359c1696973893317
53 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
1013 ms
masonry.min.js
956 ms
main.js
978 ms
complianz.min.js
983 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
967 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
1026 ms
waypoints.min.js
998 ms
core.min.js
1018 ms
frontend.min.js
1016 ms
underscore.min.js
1003 ms
wp-util.min.js
1009 ms
frontend.min.js
989 ms
photoswipe.min.js
986 ms
photoswipe-ui-default.min.js
958 ms
add-to-cart-variation.min.js
915 ms
single-product.min.js
902 ms
lazyload.min.js
917 ms
chatter.digital
5915 ms
Chatter-Logo-200x50-1.png
792 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
21 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
37 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEA.ttf
38 ms
Flaticon.woff
989 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
1321 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
1017 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
1291 ms
chatter-logo-Andy-white-e1602162274347.png
1399 ms
illustration24.png
1402 ms
process1.png
1409 ms
feature4.png
1401 ms
8-Tips-to-Choose-the-Right-Hashtag-on-Instagram-300x251.jpg
1328 ms
Untitled-design-1-300x131.png
1283 ms
Side-Hustles-1-300x251.jpg
1290 ms
Website-Conversion-Rates-300x251.jpg
1280 ms
Social-Media-Managers-in-the-age-of-AI-300x169.jpg
1263 ms
On-Page-SEO-300x251.jpg
1223 ms
footer2_bg.png
1425 ms
chatter.digital
347 ms
chatter.digital
2252 ms
chatter.digital
348 ms
chatter.digital
271 ms
g.gif
81 ms
fa-solid-900.ttf
392 ms
fa-regular-400.ttf
236 ms
fa-brands-400.ttf
20 ms
chatter.digital accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
chatter.digital best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
chatter.digital SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Chatter.digital can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Chatter.digital main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
chatter.digital
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Chatter. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: