27.1 sec in total
1.6 sec
18.3 sec
7.1 sec
Visit checkrankings.com now to see the best up-to-date Checkrankings content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about checkrankings.com
Purchase Body Research Bonavar online in UK, Body Research Bonavar steroids for sale online in USA, Purchase anabolic steroids, Body Research Bonavar, Serum carbohydrate-deficient transferrin values (...
Visit checkrankings.comWe analyzed Checkrankings.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.6 sec and then it took 25.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster.
checkrankings.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.6 s
94/100
10%
Value1.8 s
99/100
25%
Value1.9 s
100/100
10%
Value10 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.024
100/100
15%
Value1.7 s
100/100
10%
1639 ms
926 ms
923 ms
1011 ms
1011 ms
Our browser made a total of 89 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Checkrankings.com, 6% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 4% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.4 sec) relates to the external source Googleads.g.doubleclick.net.
Page size can be reduced by 1.5 MB (17%)
8.8 MB
7.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Checkrankings.com main page is 8.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 7.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 32.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 32.0 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 419.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Checkrankings images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 807.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 807.7 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 229.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Checkrankings.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 229.6 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 54 (67%)
81
27
The browser has sent 81 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Checkrankings. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 36 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 20 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
thmarine.com
1639 ms
css
926 ms
widgets.css
923 ms
category.css
1011 ms
click.css
1011 ms
amazon.css
1167 ms
mirasvit_searchindex.css
1145 ms
mirasvit_seo.css
1146 ms
sitemap.css
1276 ms
bootstrap.min.css
1521 ms
styles.css
987 ms
custom-styles.css
991 ms
thstyles.css
1038 ms
settings.css
1241 ms
dynamic.css
1747 ms
static.css
1839 ms
prototype.js
2141 ms
ccard.js
1817 ms
validation.js
1754 ms
builder.js
1754 ms
effects.js
1753 ms
dragdrop.js
1754 ms
controls.js
2074 ms
slider.js
2072 ms
js.js
2073 ms
form.js
2073 ms
menu.js
2032 ms
translate.js
2031 ms
cookies.js
2031 ms
jquery.min.js
2032 ms
jquery.noconflict.js
2286 ms
jquery.min.js
2285 ms
underscore.js
2286 ms
backbone.js
2284 ms
form.js
2284 ms
autocomplete.js
2280 ms
jquery-1.11.0.min.js
2241 ms
font-awesome.min.css
2032 ms
css
2032 ms
conversion.js
2207 ms
jquery-migrate-1.2.1.min.js
2254 ms
gtm.js
2190 ms
jquery.noconflict.js
1993 ms
click2click.js
1992 ms
noconflict.js
1837 ms
jquery.min.js
1837 ms
bootstrap.min.js
1835 ms
css
1757 ms
jquery.scripts.js
1756 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
1768 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
1707 ms
css
987 ms
css
985 ms
analytics.js
931 ms
thlogo.png
993 ms
serving-the-marine-industry-since-1975.png
168 ms
cart.png
168 ms
sprite.png
167 ms
loader.gif
165 ms
1_boatwake_1_1600x900x96.jpg
972 ms
2_bassboatsunset_1_1600x900x96.jpg
916 ms
3_flatsboat_1_1600x900x96.jpg
835 ms
4_pontoon_1_1600x900x96.jpg
1130 ms
5_centerconsole_1_1600x900x96.jpg
1099 ms
6_wakeski_1_1600x900x96.jpg
937 ms
smile.png
832 ms
new-products.jpg
864 ms
T-HMarineCatalog-2017.png
1054 ms
o2-marine-technologies.jpg
870 ms
oldLogo.jpg
1054 ms
loader.js
59 ms
home-thumb-left.png
1351 ms
collect
318 ms
collect
1544 ms
impl-1_23.js
173 ms
home-thumb-middle.png
439 ms
home-thumb-right.png
969 ms
Y_TKV6o8WovbUd3m_X9aAA.ttf
433 ms
HqHm7BVC_nzzTui2lzQTDaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
964 ms
y5-5zezrZlJHkmIVxRH3BaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
1180 ms
bH7276GfdCjMjApa_dkG6aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
1179 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
963 ms
wcm
1146 ms
ga-audiences
726 ms
2444 ms
loader.gif
1367 ms
large_left.png
384 ms
large_right.png
400 ms
584 ms
checkrankings.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
checkrankings.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
checkrankings.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Checkrankings.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Checkrankings.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
checkrankings.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Checkrankings. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: