4 sec in total
211 ms
1.4 sec
2.4 sec
Visit checkworks.com now to see the best up-to-date Checkworks content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about checkworks.com
Visit checkworks.comWe analyzed Checkworks.com page load time and found that the first response time was 211 ms and then it took 3.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
checkworks.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value7.9 s
0/100
10%
Value16.0 s
0/100
25%
Value14.6 s
1/100
10%
Value8,710 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.155
74/100
15%
Value19.9 s
2/100
10%
211 ms
122 ms
182 ms
34 ms
116 ms
Our browser made a total of 50 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 78% of them (39 requests) were addressed to the original Checkworks.com, 4% (2 requests) were made to Smarticon.geotrust.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Sealserver.trustwave.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (364 ms) belongs to the original domain Checkworks.com.
Page size can be reduced by 147.5 kB (12%)
1.2 MB
1.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Checkworks.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 956.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 22.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 5.3 kB, which is 18% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 22.5 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Checkworks images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 111.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 111.3 kB or 54% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 10.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Checkworks.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 10.1 kB or 72% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 5 (11%)
47
42
The browser has sent 47 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Checkworks. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
checkworks.com
211 ms
screen.min.css
122 ms
jquery.tools.min.js
182 ms
si.js
34 ms
seal.js
116 ms
conversion.js
27 ms
bg-nav.gif
39 ms
analytics.js
228 ms
logo-checkworks.png
201 ms
bbbrating.gif
201 ms
slide-personal4.jpg
360 ms
slide-covers.jpg
220 ms
slide-business.jpg
200 ms
slide-computer.jpg
218 ms
slide-desk.jpg
222 ms
slide-register.jpg
221 ms
csg-s.jpg
191 ms
csy-s.jpg
205 ms
antique_check-s.jpg
205 ms
gift3-s.jpg
312 ms
circlesc-s.jpg
312 ms
fg11-s.jpg
313 ms
cloud_blue-s.jpg
338 ms
fish-s.jpg
338 ms
capital-s.jpg
342 ms
icon-grn-bullet.png
342 ms
flag_top.jpg
327 ms
wallstreet_center.jpg
329 ms
marble_mauve_3up.jpg
328 ms
cloud_blue_top.jpg
329 ms
wallstreet.jpg
338 ms
Voucher_Buff.jpg
339 ms
Estate.jpg
337 ms
FG.jpg
336 ms
SF.jpg
335 ms
1upantique.jpg
336 ms
wcl25-s.jpg
364 ms
register1.jpg
361 ms
59-s.jpg
356 ms
estamper.jpg
357 ms
pocregcover-w.jpg
358 ms
checkmaster-s.jpg
357 ms
logo-bbb.gif
352 ms
collect
125 ms
collect
223 ms
smarticon
260 ms
seal_image.php
78 ms
bat.js
306 ms
ga-audiences
210 ms
90 ms
checkworks.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
checkworks.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
checkworks.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Checkworks.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Checkworks.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
checkworks.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Checkworks. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: