Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 59

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 26% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

choices-avr.org.uk

choices-avr.org.uk

Page Load Speed

2.4 sec in total

First Response

258 ms

Resources Loaded

2 sec

Page Rendered

179 ms

choices-avr.org.uk screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Choices Avr content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about choices-avr.org.uk

Visit choices-avr.org.uk

Key Findings

We analyzed Choices-avr.org.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 258 ms and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

choices-avr.org.uk performance score

0

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value0

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value0

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value0

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.075

95/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value0

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

choices-avr.org.uk

258 ms

choices

659 ms

site-datauri.css

528 ms

modernizr.js

154 ms

site.js

611 ms

Our browser made a total of 21 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 5% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Choices-avr.org.uk, 76% (16 requests) were made to Refugee-action.org.uk and 10% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (659 ms) relates to the external source Refugee-action.org.uk.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 326.1 kB (61%)

Content Size

534.0 kB

After Optimization

207.9 kB

In fact, the total size of Choices-avr.org.uk main page is 534.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 297.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-64%

Potential reduce by 6.7 kB

  • Original 10.4 kB
  • After minification 10.3 kB
  • After compression 3.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 6.7 kB or 64% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-67%

Potential reduce by 198.0 kB

  • Original 297.7 kB
  • After minification 297.7 kB
  • After compression 99.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 198.0 kB or 67% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-54%

Potential reduce by 121.4 kB

  • Original 226.0 kB
  • After minification 225.9 kB
  • After compression 104.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Choices-avr.org.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 121.4 kB or 54% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (38%)

Requests Now

8

After Optimization

5

The browser has sent 8 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Choices Avr. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

choices-avr.org.uk accessibility score

59

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

choices-avr.org.uk best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

choices-avr.org.uk SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Choices-avr.org.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Choices-avr.org.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Choices Avr. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: