10.4 sec in total
1.7 sec
8.2 sec
474 ms
Welcome to chromatopak.com homepage info - get ready to check Chromatopak best content right away, or after learning these important things about chromatopak.com
Visit chromatopak.comWe analyzed Chromatopak.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.7 sec and then it took 8.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
chromatopak.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.8 s
11/100
10%
Value5.1 s
25/100
25%
Value11.7 s
4/100
10%
Value110 ms
97/100
30%
Value0.236
53/100
15%
Value11.4 s
18/100
10%
1708 ms
794 ms
540 ms
532 ms
1327 ms
Our browser made a total of 53 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 87% of them (46 requests) were addressed to the original Chromatopak.com, 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Fast.wistia.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Chromatopak.com.
Page size can be reduced by 367.1 kB (35%)
1.0 MB
672.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Chromatopak.com main page is 1.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 525.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 29.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 29.4 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 12.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Chromatopak images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 264.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 264.1 kB or 65% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 61.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Chromatopak.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 61.2 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 29 (56%)
52
23
The browser has sent 52 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Chromatopak. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.chromatopak.com
1708 ms
style.css
794 ms
mobile.css
540 ms
jquery.kwicks.css
532 ms
jquery-1.8.1.min.js
1327 ms
jquery.kwicks.js
821 ms
styles.css
551 ms
prettyPhoto.css
1065 ms
jquery.js
1587 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
829 ms
popover-v1.js
35 ms
jquery.form.min.js
812 ms
scripts.js
847 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.js
1130 ms
comment-reply.min.js
1109 ms
wp-embed.min.js
1109 ms
inits.js
1421 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
566 ms
analytics.js
6 ms
counter.js
27 ms
collect
44 ms
t.php
215 ms
cp-logo.png
777 ms
1979b6d75502b473b315a2ec47ca862a30b4b00e.jpg
200 ms
10.png
453 ms
edge-shadows.png
453 ms
tagline.png
450 ms
search.png
449 ms
fb.png
451 ms
in.png
547 ms
nav_bg.png
548 ms
header_bg.png
567 ms
menu-bg.jpg
567 ms
button-big.png
579 ms
nav_top_bg.png
580 ms
main_bg.png
818 ms
panel1.jpg
1095 ms
panel2.jpg
1436 ms
panel3.jpg
1124 ms
panel4.jpg
1640 ms
panel5.jpg
1119 ms
panel7.jpg
1350 ms
peerless.png
1402 ms
cplogos.gif
1429 ms
newsletter.png
1674 ms
button.png
1633 ms
sidebar.png
1670 ms
sidebar_top.png
1711 ms
sidebar_btm.png
1711 ms
1.png
1874 ms
jquery.fancybox.css
43 ms
ajax-loader.gif
1724 ms
navarrows.png
1770 ms
chromatopak.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
chromatopak.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
chromatopak.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Chromatopak.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Chromatopak.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
chromatopak.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Chromatopak. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: