838 ms in total
124 ms
507 ms
207 ms
Visit citescape.com now to see the best up-to-date Citescape content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about citescape.com
Arvig now provides internet and phone service to customers formerly served by Palmer Wireless/CitEscape. Here’s how to contact us for more information.
Visit citescape.comWe analyzed Citescape.com page load time and found that the first response time was 124 ms and then it took 714 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.
citescape.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.8 s
58/100
10%
Value7.5 s
4/100
25%
Value7.4 s
28/100
10%
Value2,040 ms
7/100
30%
Value0.176
68/100
15%
Value12.4 s
14/100
10%
124 ms
77 ms
76 ms
75 ms
115 ms
Our browser made a total of 36 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 94% of them (34 requests) were addressed to the original Citescape.com, 6% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (220 ms) belongs to the original domain Citescape.com.
Page size can be reduced by 158.4 kB (36%)
439.1 kB
280.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Citescape.com main page is 439.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 255.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 6.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 6.2 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 41.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Citescape needs image optimization as it can save up to 41.4 kB or 16% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 103.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 103.3 kB or 62% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 7.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Citescape.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 7.5 kB or 81% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 8 (23%)
35
27
The browser has sent 35 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Citescape. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
citescape.com
124 ms
mootools.js
77 ms
caption.js
76 ms
template.css
75 ms
jquery-1.4.2.min.js
115 ms
ga.js
36 ms
body-bg.jpg
37 ms
top-bg-tile.png
39 ms
citescape-logo.gif
39 ms
nav-services.png
39 ms
nav-hover-arrows.gif
75 ms
nav-resources.png
74 ms
nav-updates.png
75 ms
nav-about.png
75 ms
nav-contact.png
76 ms
nav-help.png
76 ms
header-citescape-button.gif
110 ms
header-citescape-content.png
151 ms
header-citevoice-button.gif
116 ms
header-citevoice-content.png
181 ms
header-citevault-button.gif
116 ms
header-citevault-content.png
150 ms
black-bg-tile.gif
144 ms
middle-top-bg-tile.gif
149 ms
title-client-portal.jpg
147 ms
nav-bill.jpg
179 ms
nav-email.jpg
184 ms
nav-vmail.jpg
184 ms
title-updates.jpg
184 ms
read-more-bg.jpg
185 ms
footer-bg-tile.png
215 ms
logo-footer-dish.jpg
214 ms
logo-footer-direct.jpg
220 ms
logo-footer-avast.jpg
219 ms
cn2.png
219 ms
__utm.gif
15 ms
citescape.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
citescape.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
citescape.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Citescape.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Citescape.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
citescape.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Citescape. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: