839 ms in total
116 ms
567 ms
156 ms
Click here to check amazing Clic content for Spain. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about clic.es
Learn Spanish in Spain with CLIC, a leading Spanish Language School, offering English, Spanish and other language courses in Seville, Malaga & Cadiz
Visit clic.esWe analyzed Clic.es page load time and found that the first response time was 116 ms and then it took 723 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.
clic.es performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.3 s
40/100
10%
Value7.7 s
3/100
25%
Value8.1 s
21/100
10%
Value1,910 ms
8/100
30%
Value0.346
32/100
15%
Value12.1 s
16/100
10%
116 ms
26 ms
52 ms
48 ms
98 ms
Our browser made a total of 68 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 74% of them (50 requests) were addressed to the original Clic.es, 10% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (223 ms) relates to the external source Google-analytics.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.1 MB (80%)
1.4 MB
282.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Clic.es main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 778.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 39.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 39.8 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 301 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Clic images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 398.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 398.0 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 687.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Clic.es needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 687.7 kB or 88% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 55 (92%)
60
5
The browser has sent 60 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Clic. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 19 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
clic.es
116 ms
language-selector.css
26 ms
ultimate-tables.css
52 ms
jquery.dataTables.css
48 ms
css
98 ms
style.css
66 ms
clic-custom-tables.css
50 ms
style.min.css
53 ms
style.css
70 ms
css
108 ms
css
110 ms
style.css
52 ms
shortcodes.css
57 ms
shortcodes_responsive.css
84 ms
magnific_popup.css
54 ms
jetpack.css
74 ms
jquery.js
84 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
80 ms
jquery.cookie.js
72 ms
browser-redirect.js
81 ms
style.css
83 ms
jquery.dataTables.min.js
90 ms
frontend-builder-global-functions.js
82 ms
idle-timer.min.js
84 ms
custom.js
84 ms
gallery.min.js
86 ms
jquery.uniform.min.js
85 ms
custom.js
85 ms
idle-timer.min.js
87 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
80 ms
gprofiles.js
98 ms
wpgroho.js
85 ms
jquery.mobile.custom.min.js
87 ms
custom.js
89 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
87 ms
waypoints.min.js
86 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.js
87 ms
frontend-builder-scripts.js
90 ms
wp-embed.min.js
88 ms
sitepress.js
88 ms
scripts.js
88 ms
e-201611.js
82 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
66 ms
style.css
59 ms
analytics.js
223 ms
hovercard.css
73 ms
services.css
78 ms
nav-arrow-down.png
19 ms
en.png
20 ms
es.png
20 ms
de.png
20 ms
fr.png
22 ms
it.png
22 ms
ja.png
23 ms
ru.png
23 ms
zh-hans.png
22 ms
pt-br.png
24 ms
clic_logo_bodyline.png
23 ms
ih_seville_cadiz_logo1.png
24 ms
u-WUoqrET9fUeobQW7jkRaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
47 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
48 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTdqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf
53 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNStqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf
52 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzNqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf
50 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
50 ms
EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-htqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf
51 ms
g.gif
20 ms
collect
62 ms
clic.es accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
clic.es best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
clic.es SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Clic.es can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Clic.es main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
clic.es
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Clic. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: