3.4 sec in total
269 ms
2.9 sec
252 ms
Click here to check amazing Client Engage content for Yemen. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about clientengage.com
PHP Script Development, PHP Live-Chat
Visit clientengage.comWe analyzed Clientengage.com page load time and found that the first response time was 269 ms and then it took 3.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
clientengage.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value9.8 s
0/100
10%
Value29.8 s
0/100
25%
Value14.1 s
1/100
10%
Value610 ms
49/100
30%
Value0.616
10/100
15%
Value19.6 s
2/100
10%
269 ms
98 ms
194 ms
205 ms
207 ms
Our browser made a total of 77 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 81% of them (62 requests) were addressed to the original Clientengage.com, 13% (10 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Clientengage.com.
Page size can be reduced by 2.1 MB (35%)
6.1 MB
4.0 MB
In fact, the total size of Clientengage.com main page is 6.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 78.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 78.8 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 53.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Client Engage images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 949.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 949.9 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.0 MB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Clientengage.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.0 MB or 79% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 41 (63%)
65
24
The browser has sent 65 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Client Engage. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 22 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.clientengage.com
269 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
98 ms
color-picker.min.css
194 ms
farbtastic.min.css
205 ms
front_end_style.css
207 ms
dashicons.min.css
401 ms
desktop_style.css
215 ms
settings.css
323 ms
wp-syntax.css
289 ms
style.css
304 ms
bootstrap.css
795 ms
bootstrap-responsive.css
421 ms
animate.css
569 ms
font-awesome.css
501 ms
style.css
738 ms
entypo.css
503 ms
quoterotator.css
629 ms
animate.css
804 ms
magnific-popup.css
604 ms
main.css
755 ms
elements.css
707 ms
wp_add.css
735 ms
theme-responsive.css
809 ms
jquery.js
1147 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
843 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
1036 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
991 ms
js
52 ms
wp-syntax.js
892 ms
comment-reply.min.js
908 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
14 ms
bootstrap.js
1051 ms
jquery.isotope.min.js
992 ms
imagesloaded.pkgd.min.js
1011 ms
jquery.quoterotator.min.js
1089 ms
jquery.inview.js
1092 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.min.js
1112 ms
jquery.carouFredSel-6.2.1.js
1268 ms
main.js
1197 ms
custom.js
1112 ms
plugins.js
1016 ms
wp-embed.min.js
1070 ms
ga.js
12 ms
css
63 ms
ClientEngage_Website_Logo.png
105 ms
slider_bg_1.png
668 ms
ClientEngage_Visitor-Chat_Banner.png
391 ms
slider_bg_2.png
801 ms
noteplex_inline-preview-image1.png
503 ms
ClientEngage_Project-Platform_Banner.png
389 ms
ClientEngage_Visitor-Voice_Banner.png
543 ms
ClientEngage_Design-Note_Banner.png
543 ms
ClientEngage_Visitor-Chat_for_WordPress_Banner.png
624 ms
UberChat-Preview-Image-190x190.png
617 ms
ClientEngage_Visitor-Chat_for_WordPress_Banner-190x190.png
665 ms
ClientEngage_Design-Note_Banner-190x190.png
682 ms
ClientEngage_Visitor-Voice_Banner-190x190.png
719 ms
ClientEngage_Project-Platform_Banner-190x190.png
729 ms
noteplex_inline-preview-image1-190x190.png
761 ms
ClientEngage_Visitor-Chat_Banner-190x190.png
765 ms
CakePHP-User-Online-Status-270x230.png
793 ms
CakePHP-Localisation-Tutorial-Screenshot-270x230.png
834 ms
__utm.gif
49 ms
wood_texture.png
894 ms
plus.png
775 ms
testimonial-background.png
867 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
29 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTYnF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
28 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSonF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
28 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
28 ms
EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-honF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
28 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
678 ms
PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxrfB31yxOzP-czbf6AAKCVo.ttf
28 ms
xjAJXh38I15wypJXxuGMBp0EAVxt0G0biEntp43Qt6E.ttf
28 ms
PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxi8cqLH4MEiSE0ROcU-qHOA.ttf
29 ms
PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxp_TkvowlIOtbR7ePgFOpF4.ttf
29 ms
PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxlDMrAYtoOisqqMDW9M_Mqc.ttf
27 ms
clientengage.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
clientengage.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
clientengage.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Clientengage.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Clientengage.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
clientengage.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Client Engage. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: