14.4 sec in total
1.4 sec
12.2 sec
820 ms
Click here to check amazing Cms Rwc content for Japan. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about cms-rwc.com
集客することだけに特化して開発されたCMS Ryoma Web Creator 公式サイトです。集客するために必要な機能を全て網羅しています。
Visit cms-rwc.comWe analyzed Cms-rwc.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.4 sec and then it took 13 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
cms-rwc.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.5 s
34/100
10%
Value13.8 s
0/100
25%
Value14.8 s
1/100
10%
Value740 ms
40/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value27.3 s
0/100
10%
1371 ms
734 ms
343 ms
344 ms
356 ms
Our browser made a total of 89 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 90% of them (80 requests) were addressed to the original Cms-rwc.com, 2% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to S.ytimg.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (9.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Cms-rwc.com.
Page size can be reduced by 757.7 kB (41%)
1.9 MB
1.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Cms-rwc.com main page is 1.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 42.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 42.9 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 194.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Cms Rwc needs image optimization as it can save up to 194.5 kB or 18% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 240.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 240.3 kB or 64% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 280.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Cms-rwc.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 280.0 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 16 (19%)
86
70
The browser has sent 86 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Cms Rwc. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
cms-rwc.com
1371 ms
jquery.js
734 ms
jquery.lazyload.min.js
343 ms
ccm.base.css
344 ms
ccm.base.js
356 ms
ctw_social.css
376 ms
common_style.css
813 ms
view.css
513 ms
view.css
513 ms
swfobject.js
533 ms
main.css
765 ms
typography.css
1028 ms
sp.css
883 ms
popup.js
710 ms
analytics.js
6 ms
collect
14 ms
body-bg.png
209 ms
siteId.png
210 ms
bg-nav.png
207 ms
mainVisual_01.png
2096 ms
mainVisual_02.png
207 ms
top_movie_head.png
211 ms
h2_01.png
346 ms
top_pic_01-1.png
689 ms
top_pic_01-2.gif
547 ms
h2_02.png
362 ms
RWC_logo_onText03.png
404 ms
check_red.png
517 ms
h2_03.png
542 ms
top_pic_03-1.png
596 ms
top_pic_03-2.png
860 ms
top_pic_03-3.png
720 ms
top_pic_03-4.png
730 ms
top_pic_03-5.png
790 ms
top_pic_03-6.png
858 ms
top_pic_03-7.png
899 ms
h2_04.png
911 ms
top_pic_04-1.png
983 ms
top_reason_h3_01.png
1030 ms
top_pic_04-2.png
1717 ms
top_reason_h3_02.png
1078 ms
e3a14f08899a8abc99558585fc2d94aa_f228.gif
1278 ms
top_reason_h3_03.png
1176 ms
h2_05.png
1201 ms
top_15point_pic_01.gif
2517 ms
kinou1.png
1371 ms
top_15point_pic_02.gif
4539 ms
kinou2.png
1459 ms
top_15point_pic_03.gif
4339 ms
kinou3.png
1644 ms
top_15point_pic_04.gif
3855 ms
kinou4.png
1887 ms
100 ms
www-embed-player-vflfNyN_r.css
19 ms
www-embed-player.js
40 ms
Tqng9ngJVK4Gqvh3e602hP-HqlN49KFEUSDtmrOPmWo.js
42 ms
ad_status.js
82 ms
top_15point_pic_05.gif
3253 ms
kinou5.png
2076 ms
top_15point_pic_06.gif
9520 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
73 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
74 ms
kinou6.png
2492 ms
top_15point_pic_07.gif
3584 ms
kinou7.png
3285 ms
top_15point_pic_08.gif
5702 ms
kinou8.png
3572 ms
d1a6e4453c6762454b3aa210d65db88e_f206.png
3528 ms
kinou9.png
3612 ms
top_15point_pic_10.gif
4055 ms
kinou10.png
3737 ms
497bda3f4b0f98762c06388074737a93_f208.gif
3827 ms
kinou11.png
3816 ms
top_15point_pic_12.gif
4881 ms
kinou12.png
3940 ms
top_15point_pic_13.gif
5260 ms
kinou13.png
3925 ms
ad465f1cad9414a30e5c368c71ce1a51_f211.gif
4026 ms
kinou14.png
4055 ms
top_15point_pic_15.gif
4745 ms
kinou15.png
4119 ms
h2_06.png
4255 ms
top_pic_06.png
4342 ms
top_btn_off.png
4500 ms
top_pic_07-2.png
4513 ms
offer.png
4512 ms
offer_01_btn_off.png
4462 ms
offer_02_btn_off.png
4323 ms
pageTop_off.png
4351 ms
cms-rwc.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
cms-rwc.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
cms-rwc.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
JA
JA
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Cms-rwc.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Japanese is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Cms-rwc.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
cms-rwc.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Cms Rwc. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: