2.9 sec in total
349 ms
2.4 sec
171 ms
Visit cocipa.es now to see the best up-to-date COCIPA content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about cocipa.es
Planes de formación para jóvenes inscritos en Garantía Juvenil. Formación cofinanciada por el Fondo Social Europeo y el Ayuntamiento de PalenciaCon la
Visit cocipa.esWe analyzed Cocipa.es page load time and found that the first response time was 349 ms and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
cocipa.es performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.5 s
6/100
10%
Value21.1 s
0/100
25%
Value12.2 s
3/100
10%
Value1,100 ms
23/100
30%
Value0.696
7/100
15%
Value14.5 s
9/100
10%
349 ms
114 ms
220 ms
221 ms
227 ms
Our browser made a total of 63 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 41% of them (26 requests) were addressed to the original Cocipa.es, 35% (22 requests) were made to Pbs.twimg.com and 8% (5 requests) were made to Platform.twitter.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Cocipa.es.
Page size can be reduced by 79.7 kB (7%)
1.2 MB
1.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Cocipa.es main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 8.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 8.6 kB or 67% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 22.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. COCIPA images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 12.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 12.7 kB or 35% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 35.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Cocipa.es needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 35.7 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (18%)
60
49
The browser has sent 60 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of COCIPA. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
cocipa.es
349 ms
style.css
114 ms
nivo-slider.css
220 ms
jquery.min.js
221 ms
jquery.nivo.slider.js
227 ms
jquery.min.js
10 ms
jquery.bxslider.min.js
249 ms
jquery.bxslider.css
249 ms
piwik.js
509 ms
banner_formac.jpg
487 ms
despachos_alq.jpg
451 ms
vivero4.gif
520 ms
tutorempresa.jpg
1655 ms
YSE.gif
1404 ms
bannerfpdual.gif
1809 ms
bgcamara.jpg
128 ms
camara180_59.png
129 ms
casa.png
134 ms
i.png
141 ms
86.png
713 ms
76.png
884 ms
68.jpg
476 ms
04.jpg
461 ms
facebook20.png
251 ms
twitter20.png
266 ms
in20.png
419 ms
widgets.js
26 ms
bx_loader.gif
414 ms
controls.png
453 ms
timeline.d11f7a3b3287fb94220e8ee6d03cc772.js
26 ms
syndication
80 ms
455613151392710656
187 ms
proxy.jpg
48 ms
proxy.jpg
41 ms
timeline.47ab5d19e8ed22531abcf4f86f3ae53a.light.ltr.css
12 ms
timeline.47ab5d19e8ed22531abcf4f86f3ae53a.light.ltr.css
16 ms
u55yta9if6q8uvqfehx5_normal.jpeg
34 ms
QNr6zNaM_normal.jpg
35 ms
ZCbI1J9a_normal.jpeg
123 ms
-HcOvieZ_normal.jpeg
89 ms
49f902c2de29cc689b149501122c5946_normal.png
89 ms
b92a40233a8a80eb212a4bdb248b30d6_normal.png
86 ms
Px4klMVq_normal.jpeg
89 ms
d6e671fe6f99470784791f646849b10a_normal.jpeg
91 ms
CdroFv3WEAECITr.jpg:small
95 ms
CdrwOudWoAAbZWq.jpg:small
92 ms
CdvO4A0XIAAyfGL.jpg:small
97 ms
CdvPiAIWoAAC4XT.jpg:small
91 ms
Cdr05siXEAESR76.jpg:small
100 ms
CdruucbW4AApoCL.jpg:small
102 ms
CdlKbj9W8AEMSRE.jpg:small
110 ms
Cdf3Dh4UEAA9KWs.jpg:small
104 ms
Cdf3WLzWIAA88vT.jpg:small
113 ms
Cdf365qWwAApjj8.jpg:small
110 ms
CdM5c8SXEAE7kMR.jpg:small
113 ms
CdH8yxTUUAQ6RTR.jpg:small
117 ms
CdA4OxWW0AEPFJZ.jpg:small
127 ms
Cc9aqDeXEAAHnJi.jpg:small
124 ms
syndication_bundle_v1_64fcb3dd2f6da5b5f976d91a319ef73e329c1a5d.css
27 ms
syndication_bundle_v1_64fcb3dd2f6da5b5f976d91a319ef73e329c1a5d.css
72 ms
proxy.jpg
8 ms
proxy.jpg
4 ms
jot.html
2 ms
cocipa.es accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
button, link, and menuitem elements do not have accessible names.
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
cocipa.es best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
cocipa.es SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
ES
SP
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Cocipa.es can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Spanish is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed language. Our system also found out that Cocipa.es main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
cocipa.es
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of COCIPA. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: