13.8 sec in total
3.2 sec
10.5 sec
201 ms
Visit codeprint.co.uk now to see the best up-to-date Code Print content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about codeprint.co.uk
Based in Nottingham, Code Print & Code Promotional are a print management company who provide their customers with print and promotional merchandise.
Visit codeprint.co.ukWe analyzed Codeprint.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 3.2 sec and then it took 10.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
codeprint.co.uk performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value13.5 s
0/100
10%
Value29.1 s
0/100
25%
Value36.2 s
0/100
10%
Value2,250 ms
6/100
30%
Value0.071
96/100
15%
Value28.4 s
0/100
10%
3160 ms
102 ms
63 ms
204 ms
252 ms
Our browser made a total of 98 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 65% of them (64 requests) were addressed to the original Codeprint.co.uk, 9% (9 requests) were made to Use.typekit.net and 5% (5 requests) were made to Youtube.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Codeprint.co.uk.
Page size can be reduced by 223.7 kB (14%)
1.6 MB
1.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Codeprint.co.uk main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 788.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 66.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 66.9 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 2.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Code Print images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 83.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 83.3 kB or 16% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 70.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Codeprint.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 70.6 kB or 36% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 53 (63%)
84
31
The browser has sent 84 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Code Print. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 37 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 18 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.codeprint.co.uk
3160 ms
qqv0erj.js
102 ms
js
63 ms
style.min.css
204 ms
styles.css
252 ms
settings.css
311 ms
css
40 ms
css
51 ms
css
58 ms
settings.css
328 ms
normalize.3.0.1.css
337 ms
style.css
341 ms
jquery.flexmenu.css
342 ms
jquery-ui.css
30 ms
bootstrap.min.css
453 ms
animate.min.css
415 ms
font-awesome.min.css
40 ms
ketchup-styles.css
423 ms
media-queries.css
427 ms
jquery.min.js
552 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
436 ms
bootstrap.min.js
520 ms
jquery.mixitup.min.js
516 ms
modernizr.2.8.3.js
519 ms
conditionizr-4.4.0.min.js
527 ms
jquery.flexmenu.js
545 ms
jquery-ui.js
35 ms
jquery.easing.min.js
614 ms
jquery-scrollto.js
610 ms
jquery.stellar.min.js
632 ms
CSSscrollAnimation.js
634 ms
enquire.js
648 ms
skrollr.js
661 ms
frontend-gtag.min.js
701 ms
lightbox.js
706 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
816 ms
jquery.themepunch.essential.min.js
831 ms
css
12 ms
counter.js
66 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
754 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
695 ms
font-awesome.css
724 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
718 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
810 ms
index.js
824 ms
_main.js
825 ms
classie.js
859 ms
js
56 ms
analytics.js
21 ms
collect
12 ms
cbpAnimatedHeader.js
735 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
737 ms
code-logo-blank.png
203 ms
home1.jpg
260 ms
header-stroke.png
255 ms
home2.jpg
592 ms
home3.jpg
618 ms
header-bg.png
253 ms
code-logo-green.png
257 ms
header-icon-twitter.png
588 ms
header-icon-facebook.png
587 ms
header-icon-linkedin.png
588 ms
header-icon-youtube.png
586 ms
header-icon-email.png
589 ms
bounce-off.png
568 ms
6v46oLyMkuE
181 ms
print-management-hp-icon.png
550 ms
promotional-merchandise-hp-icon.png
550 ms
text-header-bg.gif
575 ms
button-arrow-white.png
575 ms
latest-news-parallax.jpg
739 ms
button-arrow-black.png
575 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
98 ms
t.php
152 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
621 ms
i
103 ms
i
170 ms
i
164 ms
i
170 ms
i
164 ms
i
132 ms
i
169 ms
i
170 ms
p.gif
162 ms
www-player.css
62 ms
www-embed-player.js
89 ms
base.js
133 ms
revolution.extension.video.min.js
564 ms
revolution.extension.slideanims.min.js
565 ms
revolution.extension.actions.min.js
564 ms
revolution.extension.layeranimation.min.js
560 ms
revolution.extension.navigation.min.js
681 ms
font
72 ms
ad_status.js
142 ms
RaBoRo_xCymm2dlJSrwnNMYK_3vPxGMh2bfo3dfd9HE.js
126 ms
embed.js
44 ms
id
41 ms
Create
103 ms
codeprint.co.uk accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
codeprint.co.uk best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
codeprint.co.uk SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Codeprint.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Codeprint.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
codeprint.co.uk
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Code Print. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: