7 sec in total
784 ms
5.7 sec
522 ms
Visit codigo.co.id now to see the best up-to-date Codigo content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about codigo.co.id
Codigo Webpage
Visit codigo.co.idWe analyzed Codigo.co.id page load time and found that the first response time was 784 ms and then it took 6.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
codigo.co.id performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.3 s
18/100
10%
Value13.0 s
0/100
25%
Value13.8 s
1/100
10%
Value1,400 ms
16/100
30%
Value0.518
15/100
15%
Value8.6 s
37/100
10%
784 ms
680 ms
490 ms
480 ms
504 ms
Our browser made a total of 79 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Codigo.co.id, 47% (37 requests) were made to Codigo.id and 33% (26 requests) were made to Maps.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.9 sec) relates to the external source Codigo.id.
Page size can be reduced by 3.3 MB (76%)
4.3 MB
1.0 MB
In fact, the total size of Codigo.co.id main page is 4.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 36.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 36.0 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 2.5 MB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Codigo needs image optimization as it can save up to 2.5 MB or 77% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 579.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 579.4 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 154.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Codigo.co.id needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 154.3 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 29 (44%)
66
37
The browser has sent 66 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Codigo. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
codigo.co.id
784 ms
codigo.id
680 ms
bootstrap.css
490 ms
style.css
480 ms
jPushMenu.css
504 ms
font-awesome.css
512 ms
codigo-font.css
515 ms
jquery-1.9.1.min.js
792 ms
jquery.form.js
7 ms
jquery.validate.min.js
9 ms
jquery.parallax-1.1.3.js
714 ms
jquery.scrollTo-1.4.2-min.js
729 ms
jquery.localscroll-1.2.7-min.js
741 ms
bootstrap.js
766 ms
main.js
768 ms
jquery.nicescroll.js
1195 ms
headroom.js
969 ms
jQuery.headroom.js
988 ms
jPushMenu.js
1018 ms
apps.js
1025 ms
js
50 ms
logo.png
265 ms
banner_bg1.jpg
1580 ms
m-bg2-blur.jpg
650 ms
banner_bg1_blur.jpg
948 ms
logo_color.png
964 ms
expertise.jpg
1571 ms
bg_about_repeat.jpg
600 ms
bg_pattern.png
842 ms
net.png
2868 ms
wsa.png
2733 ms
rs.png
2472 ms
kd.png
2765 ms
hr.png
1832 ms
AlrightSans-Regular-v3.otf
2014 ms
AlrightSans-Bold-v3.otf
2310 ms
AlrightSans-Medium-v3.otf
2259 ms
AlrightSans-ExtraThin-v3.otf
2501 ms
AlrightSans-Light-v3.otf
2573 ms
codigo.woff
2681 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
2743 ms
common.js
6 ms
map.js
19 ms
util.js
17 ms
marker.js
17 ms
onion.js
28 ms
ViewportInfoService.GetViewportInfo
55 ms
stats.js
13 ms
controls.js
9 ms
transparent.png
53 ms
css
81 ms
infowindow.js
21 ms
google4.png
27 ms
mapcnt6.png
36 ms
sv5.png
38 ms
spotlight-poi.png
38 ms
openhand_8_8.cur
37 ms
cb_scout5.png
37 ms
tmapctrl4.png
31 ms
vt
58 ms
vt
85 ms
vt
50 ms
vt
51 ms
vt
34 ms
vt
70 ms
vt
72 ms
vt
71 ms
vt
70 ms
vt
92 ms
vt
105 ms
vt
85 ms
vt
84 ms
vt
112 ms
vt
122 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
21 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
25 ms
Hgo13k-tfSpn0qi1SFdUfaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
33 ms
d-6IYplOFocCacKzxwXSOKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
36 ms
AuthenticationService.Authenticate
264 ms
codigo.co.id accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
codigo.co.id best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
codigo.co.id SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Codigo.co.id can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Codigo.co.id main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
codigo.co.id
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Codigo. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: