6.1 sec in total
671 ms
4.9 sec
513 ms
Welcome to codit2016.com homepage info - get ready to check CoDIT2016 best content right away, or after learning these important things about codit2016.com
The3rd International Conference on Control, Decision and Information Technologies (CoDIT2016)
Visit codit2016.comWe analyzed Codit2016.com page load time and found that the first response time was 671 ms and then it took 5.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
codit2016.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.8 s
11/100
10%
Value8.7 s
1/100
25%
Value6.2 s
42/100
10%
Value150 ms
94/100
30%
Value1
2/100
15%
Value4.9 s
77/100
10%
671 ms
11 ms
50 ms
28 ms
92 ms
Our browser made a total of 67 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 97% of them (65 requests) were addressed to the original Codit2016.com, 1% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Codit2016.com.
Page size can be reduced by 800.5 kB (32%)
2.5 MB
1.7 MB
In fact, the total size of Codit2016.com main page is 2.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 24.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 24.8 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 171.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. CoDIT2016 images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 509.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 509.0 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 94.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Codit2016.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 94.9 kB or 87% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 24 (40%)
60
36
The browser has sent 60 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of CoDIT2016. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
codit2016.com
671 ms
plain-blue.css
11 ms
default.css
50 ms
mootools-core.js
28 ms
core.js
92 ms
mootools-more.js
69 ms
jquery.min.js
71 ms
jquery-noconflict.js
72 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
69 ms
caption.js
89 ms
general.css
69 ms
template.css
149 ms
template.responsive.css
158 ms
css
25 ms
jquery.js
69 ms
script.js
174 ms
script.responsive.js
155 ms
jquery.min.js
153 ms
jquery.slider.css
210 ms
jquery.slider.min.js
153 ms
pageglare.png
1781 ms
page.png
773 ms
header.png
1721 ms
object1714408021.png
793 ms
object1604725775.png
1792 ms
object778759905.png
1700 ms
object536117306.png
1782 ms
object2141260545.png
1750 ms
object913981527.png
1787 ms
object1189720838.png
1776 ms
1.jpg
1845 ms
2.jpg
1865 ms
3.jpg
1907 ms
4.jpg
2070 ms
5.jpg
1900 ms
logo.png
1846 ms
object53871920.png
2778 ms
object1131001376.png
2783 ms
object1733778012.png
1883 ms
object1849085462.png
2776 ms
searchicon.png
2785 ms
menuseparator.png
2777 ms
logo.png
2794 ms
blockheadericon.png
2809 ms
blockbullets.png
3040 ms
HSP.png
2829 ms
UoM_Logo.jpg
3414 ms
IEEE_SMC.png
3556 ms
IEEE_malta.png
3742 ms
macs.jpg
3791 ms
gdrro.png
3800 ms
IEEE-RAS-Tunisia-Chapter-small2.png
3794 ms
logoi4e2.jpg
3810 ms
plain-blue.png
3785 ms
default.png
3797 ms
8XtYtNKEyyZh481XVWfVOqCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
14 ms
postheadericon.png
3825 ms
Malta_med.gif
3079 ms
Malta.jpg
3090 ms
New.gif
2178 ms
VM.jpg
2123 ms
MYutube.jpg
2128 ms
mw-logo.jpg
2111 ms
blue-flower.jpg
2132 ms
jquery-slider-theme.png
2112 ms
jquery-slider-rotator-left.png
2147 ms
jquery-slider-rotator-right.png
1697 ms
codit2016.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
codit2016.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
codit2016.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Codit2016.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Codit2016.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
codit2016.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of CoDIT2016. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: