Report Summary

  • 28

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    48% of other websites

  • 74

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 41% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 99

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    93% of websites

cofelink.com

وب سایت کافه لینک - کافه لینک

Page Load Speed

9 sec in total

First Response

3 sec

Resources Loaded

5.4 sec

Page Rendered

557 ms

cofelink.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to cofelink.com homepage info - get ready to check Cofelink best content for Iran right away, or after learning these important things about cofelink.com

کافه لینک یک وب سایت آموزشی و تفریحی است. در این مجموعه که زیر نظر کافی نت کافه لینک مدیریت و هدایت می شود تلاش دارد تا در عرصه علمی و آموزشی قدمی بردارد

Visit cofelink.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Cofelink.com page load time and found that the first response time was 3 sec and then it took 5.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

cofelink.com performance score

28

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.5 s

6/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value20.3 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value13.0 s

2/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value660 ms

45/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.106

88/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.5 s

8/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.cofelink.com

3048 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

191 ms

srr-css.css

196 ms

css

23 ms

style.css

290 ms

Our browser made a total of 89 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 96% of them (85 requests) were addressed to the original Cofelink.com, 2% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3 sec) belongs to the original domain Cofelink.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 500.5 kB (31%)

Content Size

1.6 MB

After Optimization

1.1 MB

In fact, the total size of Cofelink.com main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-91%

Potential reduce by 173.0 kB

  • Original 190.9 kB
  • After minification 170.4 kB
  • After compression 17.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 20.4 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 173.0 kB or 91% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 36.1 kB

  • Original 1.0 MB
  • After minification 988.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Cofelink images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-70%

Potential reduce by 168.3 kB

  • Original 239.1 kB
  • After minification 219.2 kB
  • After compression 70.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 168.3 kB or 70% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 123.2 kB

  • Original 144.9 kB
  • After minification 104.1 kB
  • After compression 21.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Cofelink.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 123.2 kB or 85% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 26 (31%)

Requests Now

84

After Optimization

58

The browser has sent 84 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Cofelink. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

cofelink.com accessibility score

74

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

High

Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

cofelink.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

cofelink.com SEO score

99

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    FA

  • Language Claimed

    FA

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Cofelink.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Persian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Cofelink.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Cofelink. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: