2.6 sec in total
258 ms
2 sec
297 ms
Welcome to compareandrecycle.com homepage info - get ready to check Compareandrecycle best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about compareandrecycle.com
Compare the prices offered by over 30 recyclers and see how much your old cell phone is worth.
Visit compareandrecycle.comWe analyzed Compareandrecycle.com page load time and found that the first response time was 258 ms and then it took 2.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
compareandrecycle.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.4 s
70/100
10%
Value3.8 s
55/100
25%
Value4.9 s
66/100
10%
Value14,570 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.019
100/100
15%
Value23.9 s
1/100
10%
258 ms
571 ms
519 ms
76 ms
73 ms
Our browser made a total of 40 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 5% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Compareandrecycle.com, 53% (21 requests) were made to Crus-atomjuice.netdna-ssl.com and 20% (8 requests) were made to Apis.google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (571 ms) belongs to the original domain Compareandrecycle.com.
Page size can be reduced by 141.7 kB (45%)
315.0 kB
173.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Compareandrecycle.com main page is 315.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 191.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 25.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 25.8 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 4.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Compareandrecycle images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 111.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 111.2 kB or 58% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 13 (35%)
37
24
The browser has sent 37 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Compareandrecycle. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
compareandrecycle.com
258 ms
www.compareandrecycle.com
571 ms
221303722.js
519 ms
1393860853.css
76 ms
1355934303.js
73 ms
jquery.min.js
96 ms
1435243847.js
75 ms
plusone.js
100 ms
iphone-4s-16gb-small.png
15 ms
iphone-5-16gb-small.png
191 ms
iphone-5-64gb-small.png
191 ms
iphone-5s-16gb-small.png
82 ms
no-image-small.png
248 ms
iphone-5-32gb-small.png
255 ms
google_play.png
86 ms
common_sprite_ts1355934277.png
74 ms
usa_ts1366706338.png
110 ms
region_select_ts1363106527.png
111 ms
stats_p_ts1355934273.png
138 ms
menu_sprite_ts1355934275.png
138 ms
dark_arrow_ts1355934276.png
160 ms
big_search_bg_ts1368462080.png
279 ms
easy_steps_glass_960_ts1355934276.png
318 ms
merchant_sprite_ts1391170832.png
415 ms
footer_sprite_ts1355934268.png
227 ms
sidebar_bg_ts1369142999.png
228 ms
px.gif
390 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
62 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
89 ms
fastbutton
141 ms
ga.js
145 ms
postmessageRelay
137 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
48 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
41 ms
pJeswbKZO4XwVR0035gpgvesZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.ttf
48 ms
__utm.gif
29 ms
3193398744-postmessagerelay.js
24 ms
rpc:shindig_random.js
35 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
4 ms
3400_99A57421_25A5_485C_A6E0_B2745199DA90.js
162 ms
compareandrecycle.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
compareandrecycle.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
compareandrecycle.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
ISO-8859-1
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Compareandrecycle.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Compareandrecycle.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
compareandrecycle.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Compareandrecycle. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: